NM_004360.5:c.2131C>G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points: 1P and 4B. BS2PM2_Supporting
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.2131C>G variant is <1/50,000 alleles (0.002%, 2/128,916 alleles) in the non-Finnish European subpopulation (PM2_Supporting; http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). The variant has been observed in >10 individuals without a diagnosis of diffuse gastric cancer, signet ring tumor or lobular breast cancer and whose family histories do not suggest HDGC (BS2; internal laboratory contributors). Use of the Bayesian point system for this variant with conflicting evidence. Therefore, the clinical significance of this variant is likely benign. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): PM2_Supporting, BS2. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA121988/MONDO:0007648/007
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004360.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- blepharocheilodontic syndrome 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Illumina, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, G2P
- hereditary breast carcinomaInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinomaInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet
- cleft soft palateInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- orofacial cleft 3Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- blepharocheilodontic syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- familial ovarian cancerInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH1 | NM_004360.5 | c.2131C>G | p.Leu711Val | missense_variant | Exon 13 of 16 | ENST00000261769.10 | NP_004351.1 | |
CDH1 | NM_001317184.2 | c.1948C>G | p.Leu650Val | missense_variant | Exon 12 of 15 | NP_001304113.1 | ||
CDH1 | NM_001317185.2 | c.583C>G | p.Leu195Val | missense_variant | Exon 13 of 16 | NP_001304114.1 | ||
CDH1 | NM_001317186.2 | c.166C>G | p.Leu56Val | missense_variant | Exon 12 of 15 | NP_001304115.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152144Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000400 AC: 1AN: 250252 AF XY: 0.00000739 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000404 AC: 59AN: 1461066Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0000316 AC XY: 23AN XY: 726856 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152144Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74306 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:2Benign:1
This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -
This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. -
- -
not provided Uncertain:2
BP6, PM2_supporting -
Observed in individuals with gastric cancer as well as in healthy controls (PMID: 28352678); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; Not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 8075649, 9744472, 15235021, 28352678) -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
- -
Endometrial carcinoma Pathogenic:1
- -
not specified Uncertain:1
- -
Malignant tumor of breast Uncertain:1
The CDH1 p.Leu711Val variant was identified in the heterozygous or homozygous state in 41 of 359 Chinese probands with gastric cancer and in 25 of 368 healthy individuals, although the allele frequencies could not be calculated for either population as the frequencies of heterozygotes and homozygotes were not provided separately (Lin 2014). This variant has also been reported somatically in an endometrial carcinoma with no evidence of loss of heterozygosity in tumour tissue (Risinger 1994). The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs121964871) as “With Pathogenic allele” and ClinVar (classified as uncertain significance by Ambry Genetics, Invitae, GeneDx, Color and Counsyl). The variant was identified in control databases in 2 of 276082 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.000007 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the European population in 2 of 126488 chromosomes (freq: 0.000016), but not in the African, Other, Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish, or South Asian populations. The p.Leu711 residue is conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome Benign:1
The c.2131C>G variant is <1/50,000 alleles (0.002%, 2/128,916 alleles) in the non-Finnish European subpopulation (PM2_Supporting; http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). The variant has been observed in >10 individuals without a diagnosis of diffuse gastric cancer, signet ring tumor or lobular breast cancer and whose family histories do not suggest HDGC (BS2; internal laboratory contributors). Use of the Bayesian point system for this variant with conflicting evidence. Therefore, the clinical significance of this variant is likely benign. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): PM2_Supporting, BS2. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at