NM_004360.5:c.276T>G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS2

The NM_004360.5(CDH1):​c.276T>G​(p.His92Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000013 in 1,461,872 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. H92R) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000013 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CDH1
NM_004360.5 missense

Scores

2
16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.356

Publications

1 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]
CDH1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • blepharocheilodontic syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Illumina, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, G2P
  • hereditary breast carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet
  • cleft soft palate
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • orofacial cleft 3
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • blepharocheilodontic syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • familial ovarian cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.106381804).
BP6
Variant 16-68801782-T-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-68801782-T-G is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 532442.
BS2
High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 19 AD gene.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_004360.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
CDH1
NM_004360.5
MANE Select
c.276T>Gp.His92Gln
missense
Exon 3 of 16NP_004351.1
CDH1
NM_001317184.2
c.276T>Gp.His92Gln
missense
Exon 3 of 15NP_001304113.1
CDH1
NM_001317185.2
c.-1340T>G
5_prime_UTR
Exon 3 of 16NP_001304114.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
CDH1
ENST00000261769.10
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.276T>Gp.His92Gln
missense
Exon 3 of 16ENSP00000261769.4
CDH1
ENST00000422392.6
TSL:1
c.276T>Gp.His92Gln
missense
Exon 3 of 15ENSP00000414946.2
CDH1
ENST00000562836.5
TSL:1
n.347T>G
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 2 of 15

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
33
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0000199
AC:
5
AN:
251338
AF XY:
0.0000368
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000130
AC:
19
AN:
1461872
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000206
AC XY:
15
AN XY:
727238
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000209
AC:
18
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53420
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
1111992
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0000166
AC:
1
AN:
60394
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.488
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
3
4
6
7
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
33
ExAC
AF:
0.0000330
AC:
4

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:1
Dec 04, 2023
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This missense variant replaces histidine with glutamine at codon 92 of the CDH1 protein. To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with hereditary cancer in the literature. This variant has been identified in 5/251338 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.

Dec 13, 2021
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

Jun 10, 2025
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:1
Dec 04, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This sequence change replaces histidine, which is basic and polar, with glutamine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 92 of the CDH1 protein (p.His92Gln). This variant is present in population databases (rs770967343, gnomAD 0.02%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with CDH1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 532442). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be tolerated. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.15
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.33
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.44
CADD
Benign
3.3
DANN
Benign
0.38
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.27
T
Eigen
Benign
-1.1
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.2
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.058
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.57
T
M_CAP
Benign
0.048
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.11
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.94
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.7
M
PhyloP100
-0.36
PrimateAI
Benign
0.36
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.5
N
REVEL
Benign
0.16
Sift
Benign
0.49
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.70
T
Polyphen
0.044
B
Vest4
0.20
MutPred
0.52
Gain of sheet (P = 0.1208)
MVP
0.77
MPC
0.32
ClinPred
0.12
T
GERP RS
-1.5
Varity_R
0.079
gMVP
0.26
Mutation Taster
=90/10
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs770967343; hg19: chr16-68835685; API