NM_005360.5:c.895C>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 19 ACMG points: 19P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP2PP3_StrongPP5_Very_Strong
The NM_005360.5(MAF):c.895C>T(p.Arg299Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R299G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005360.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Ayme-Gripp syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, G2P
- cataract 21 multiple typesInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Ambry Genetics
- cataract - microcornea syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- cerulean cataractInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- pulverulent cataractInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Fine-Lubinsky syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 19 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAF | ENST00000326043.5 | c.895C>T | p.Arg299Cys | missense_variant | Exon 1 of 2 | 1 | NM_005360.5 | ENSP00000327048.4 | ||
| MAF | ENST00000569649.1 | c.895C>T | p.Arg299Cys | missense_variant | Exon 1 of 2 | 5 | ENSP00000455097.1 | |||
| MAF | ENST00000393350.1 | c.895C>T | p.Arg299Cys | missense_variant | Exon 1 of 1 | 6 | ENSP00000377019.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 30
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 37
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 30
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Ayme-Gripp syndrome;C1857768:Cataract 21 multiple types Pathogenic:1
For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic. This variant disrupts the p.Arg299 amino acid residue in MAF. Other variant(s) that disrupt this residue have been determined to be pathogenic (PMID: 17982426, 25064449). This suggests that this residue is clinically significant, and that variants that disrupt this residue are likely to be disease-causing. This sequence change replaces arginine with cysteine at codon 299 of the MAF protein (p.Arg299Cys). The arginine residue is highly conserved and there is a large physicochemical difference between arginine and cysteine. This variant is not present in population databases (ExAC no frequency). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with bilateral cataracts (Invitae). In at least one individual the variant was observed to be de novo. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be disruptive. -
Cataract 21 multiple types Pathogenic:1
The c.895C>T, p.(Arg299Cys) is a missense variant in the MAF gene, which results in the amino acid substitution of Cysteine for Arginine at codon 299. This variant is not present in the gnomAD database (gnomAD version 3.1.2). Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect on the gene or gene product. The variant lies in the bZIP Maf transcription factor domain of the MAF protein (Uniprot ID: O75444). One clinical laboratory in ClinVar database has classified this variant as pathogenic (Variation ID: VCV001360617.6). A different missense p.(Arg299Ser) affecting the same codon has previously been reported among individuals with congenital cataractmicrocornea syndrome (PMID: 25064449, 17982426). Based on the above reasons, this variant is classified as Likely pathogenic. ACMG Criteria: PM2, PP3, PM1, PM5 - Likley Pathogenic -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at