NM_005787.6:c.626T>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 7 ACMG points: 7P and 0B. PM2PP2PP3_Strong
The NM_005787.6(ALG3):c.626T>C(p.Met209Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000686 in 1,458,106 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005787.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- ALG3-congenital disorder of glycosylationInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, G2P, ClinGen, PanelApp Australia, Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 7 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALG3 | NM_005787.6 | c.626T>C | p.Met209Thr | missense_variant | Exon 5 of 9 | ENST00000397676.8 | NP_005778.1 | |
| ALG3 | NM_001006941.2 | c.482T>C | p.Met161Thr | missense_variant | Exon 5 of 9 | NP_001006942.1 | ||
| ALG3 | NR_024533.1 | n.557T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 4 of 8 | ||||
| ALG3 | NR_024534.1 | n.620T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 5 of 9 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.86e-7 AC: 1AN: 1458106Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 724826 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
- -
ALG3-congenital disorder of glycosylation Uncertain:1
This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at