NM_007294.4:c.1001C>T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4BP6_Very_Strong

The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.1001C>T(p.Pro334Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000706 in 1,613,776 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P334A) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000026 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000075 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA1
NM_007294.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.973

Publications

28 publications found

Variant links:

COSMIC-nc: COSV104621708

Genes affected

BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

BRCA1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
Fanconi anemia, complementation group S
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Ambry Genetics
pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 4
Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Fanconi anemia
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

BRCA1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.26464015).

BP6

Variant 17-43094530-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-43094530-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 54099.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA1	NM_007294.4 link	c.1001C>T	p.Pro334Leu	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 23	ENST00000357654.9	NP_009225.1	P38398-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
BRCA1	ENST00000357654.9 link	c.1001C>T	p.Pro334Leu	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 23	1	NM_007294.4	ENSP00000350283.3		P38398-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000263

AC:

AN:

152006

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000242

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000199

AC:

AN:

251380

AF XY:

0.0000368

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000440

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000753

AC:

110

AN:

1461770

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000811

AC XY:

AN XY:

727178

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000299

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26134

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39698

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86252

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000188

AC:

AN:

53312

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000863

AC:

AN:

1112006

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000199

AC:

AN:

60396

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.494

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000263

AC:

AN:

152006

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000269

AC XY:

AN XY:

74236

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000242

AC:

AN:

41382

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15242

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5190

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4826

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10578

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000441

AC:

AN:

67996

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2092

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.525

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0000579

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000378

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000116

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.0000165

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:11

Revision: reviewed by expert panel

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1

Benign:3

May 29, 2002

Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1)

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 10, 2015

Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)

Significance:Benign

Review Status:reviewed by expert panel

Collection Method:curation

IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.000000271 -

Feb 21, 2017

Counsyl

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -

not provided

Benign:3

Apr 24, 2017

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The BRCA1 c.1001C>T (p.Pro334Leu) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide and is predicted to be damaging by 3/5 in silico tools. 4/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. ESE finder predicts that this variant may affect binding of multiple ESE sites. Functional studies show the variant to not affect splicing (Anczukow_2008, Caux-Moncoutier_2009). This variant was found in 2/121404 control chromosomes from ExAC at a frequency of 0.0000165, which does not exceed the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic BRCA1 variant (0.0010005); however, it could still be a rare polymorphism. The variant has been reported in multiple affected individuals via publications and databases, including co-occurrence with other BRCA1 pathogenic variants in other allele (in trans), 2120insA (Judkins_2005), c.66_67delAG (BIC), and an unspecified deleterious variant (Spearman_2008), strongly supporting for benign outcome. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases have classified this variant as benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as Benign. -

Jul 01, 2020

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 09, 2021

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 17924331, 19471317, 21990134, 18824701, 22753008, 18273839, 16267036, 23893897, 25348012, 18703817, 22045683) -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:3

Oct 22, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:curation

- -

May 22, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Jun 13, 2016

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

BRCA1-related disorder

Benign:1

Feb 27, 2020

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 30, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.10

BayesDel_addAF

Uncertain

0.061

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

-0.020

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.93

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.52

D;.;.;.;T;T;.;.;T

Eigen

Benign

-0.34

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.45

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.057

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.91

D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.16

MetaRNN

Benign

0.26

T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.36

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.5

M;M;.;.;.;.;.;.;.

PhyloP100

0.97

PrimateAI

Benign

0.24

PROVEAN

Pathogenic

-7.4

D;D;D;D;.;D;D;D;D

REVEL

Uncertain

0.45

Sift

Benign

0.040

D;D;D;D;.;D;D;D;D

Sift4G

Benign

0.061

T;T;T;T;.;D;.;T;D

Polyphen

0.58

P;.;.;B;.;.;.;.;.

Vest4

0.37

MVP

0.78

MPC

0.11

ClinPred

0.061

GERP RS

1.9

Varity_R

0.085

gMVP

0.14

Mutation Taster

=63/37

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

Splicevardb

1.0

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over