NM_015102.5:c.279+11G>A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_015102.5(NPHP4):​c.279+11G>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000702 in 1,601,012 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0038 ( 4 hom., cov: 29)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00038 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

NPHP4
NM_015102.5 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0240

Publications

1 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
NPHP4 (HGNC:19104): (nephrocystin 4) This gene encodes a protein involved in renal tubular development and function. This protein interacts with nephrocystin, and belongs to a multifunctional complex that is localized to actin- and microtubule-based structures. Mutations in this gene are associated with nephronophthisis type 4, a renal disease, and with Senior-Loken syndrome type 4, a combination of nephronophthisis and retinitis pigmentosa. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2014]
NPHP4 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • nephronophthisis 4
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • Senior-Loken syndrome 4
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • nephronophthisis 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Senior-Loken syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).
BP6
Variant 1-5978259-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-5978259-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 260548.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00376 (572/152192) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.013 (541/41486). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0121. There are 4 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 270 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 29. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 4 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
NPHP4NM_015102.5 linkc.279+11G>A intron_variant Intron 3 of 29 ENST00000378156.9 NP_055917.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NPHP4ENST00000378156.9 linkc.279+11G>A intron_variant Intron 3 of 29 1 NM_015102.5 ENSP00000367398.4 O75161-1
NPHP4ENST00000378169.7 linkn.279+11G>A intron_variant Intron 3 of 26 1 ENSP00000367411.3 D6RA06
NPHP4ENST00000489180.6 linkn.279+11G>A intron_variant Intron 3 of 32 2 ENSP00000423747.1 O75161-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00368
AC:
560
AN:
152074
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
29
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0128
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00157
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00335
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000799
AC:
183
AN:
228980
AF XY:
0.000546
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0115
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000524
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000488
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000705
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000381
AC:
552
AN:
1448820
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000345
AC XY:
248
AN XY:
719538
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0119
AC:
396
AN:
33182
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000697
AC:
30
AN:
43072
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
25868
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39164
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000143
AC:
12
AN:
84194
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
51674
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000873
AC:
5
AN:
5728
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00000904
AC:
10
AN:
1106012
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00165
AC:
99
AN:
59926
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.490
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
30
60
90
120
150
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00376
AC:
572
AN:
152192
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
0.00363
AC XY:
270
AN XY:
74396
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0130
AC:
541
AN:
41486
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00157
AC:
24
AN:
15298
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5164
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10620
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
68006
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00331
AC:
7
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.493
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
25
50
74
99
124
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00281
Hom.:
4
Bravo
AF:
0.00416
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00404
AC:
14
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:1
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Senior-Loken syndrome 4 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Nephronophthisis Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Nephronophthisis 4 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.82
CADD
Benign
0.36
DANN
Benign
0.59
PhyloP100
-0.024
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs113902159; hg19: chr1-6038319; API