NM_017636.4:c.306T>G

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2

The NM_017636.4(TRPM4):c.306T>G(p.Val102Val) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00211 in 1,566,752 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 51 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0066 ( 14 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0016 ( 37 hom. )

Consequence

TRPM4
NM_017636.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.436

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

TRPM4 (HGNC:17993): (transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M member 4) The protein encoded by this gene is a calcium-activated nonselective ion channel that mediates transport of monovalent cations across membranes, thereby depolarizing the membrane. The activity of the encoded protein increases with increasing intracellular calcium concentration, but this channel does not transport calcium. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2016]

TRPM4 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

erythrokeratodermia variabilis et progressiva 6
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
progressive familial heart block type IB
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
erythrokeratodermia variabilis
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
progressive familial heart block
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Brugada syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED, NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen

TRPM4 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.5).

BP6

Variant 19-49167955-T-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-49167955-T-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 220960.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.436 with no splicing effect.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 987 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TRPM4	NM_017636.4 link	c.306T>G	p.Val102Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 4 of 25	ENST00000252826.10	NP_060106.2	Q8TD43-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TRPM4	ENST00000252826.10 link	c.306T>G	p.Val102Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 4 of 25	1	NM_017636.4	ENSP00000252826.4		Q8TD43-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00663

AC:

986

AN:

148680

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00564

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00257

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.0123

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.0109

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.0115

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00980

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00755

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00340

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000786

AC:

AN:

241648

AF XY:

0.0000767

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000442

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.000210

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000347

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000183

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000169

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00163

AC:

2314

AN:

1417958

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00187

AC XY:

1315

AN XY:

704414

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00223

AC:

AN:

32770

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000972

AC:

AN:

44216

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00507

AC:

126

AN:

24872

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39694

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00432

AC:

351

AN:

81194

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00530

AC:

267

AN:

50378

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00267

AC:

AN:

5616

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00124

AC:

1337

AN:

1080550

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00174

AC:

102

AN:

58668

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.477

Heterozygous variant carriers

157

314

472

629

786

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00663

AC:

987

AN:

148794

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00684

AC XY:

497

AN XY:

72638

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00565

AC:

231

AN:

40908

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00257

AC:

AN:

15170

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.0123

AC:

AN:

3324

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5172

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0109

AC:

AN:

4582

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0115

AC:

116

AN:

10104

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.0106

AC:

AN:

284

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00755

AC:

500

AN:

66258

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00337

AC:

AN:

2080

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.502

Heterozygous variant carriers

147

196

245

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Alfa

AF:

0.0154

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0145

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:10

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:4

Sep 29, 2016

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 19, 2023

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:2

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Sep 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

TRPM4: BP4, BP7, BS2 -

Progressive familial heart block type IB

Benign:2

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Feb 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

TRPM4-related disorder

Benign:1

Apr 04, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Dec 15, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.50

CADD

Benign

6.4

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.70

PhyloP100

-0.44

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Mutation Taster

=99/1

polymorphism (auto)

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

NM_017636.4:c.306T>G

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over