NM_017636.4:c.322C>T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_017636.4(TRPM4):c.322C>T(p.Arg108Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00167 in 1,613,348 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 53 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R108H) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0098 ( 22 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00082 ( 31 hom. )

Consequence

TRPM4
NM_017636.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.214

Publications

5 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

TRPM4 (HGNC:17993): (transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M member 4) The protein encoded by this gene is a calcium-activated nonselective ion channel that mediates transport of monovalent cations across membranes, thereby depolarizing the membrane. The activity of the encoded protein increases with increasing intracellular calcium concentration, but this channel does not transport calcium. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2016]

TRPM4 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

erythrokeratodermia variabilis et progressiva 6
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
progressive familial heart block type IB
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
erythrokeratodermia variabilis
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
progressive familial heart block
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Brugada syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED, NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen

TRPM4 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0047257245).

BP6

Variant 19-49167971-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-49167971-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 221063.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00984 (1499/152326) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0344 (1429/41548). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0329. There are 22 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 698 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 1499 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TRPM4	NM_017636.4 link	c.322C>T	p.Arg108Cys	missense_variant	Exon 4 of 25	ENST00000252826.10	NP_060106.2	Q8TD43-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TRPM4	ENST00000252826.10 link	c.322C>T	p.Arg108Cys	missense_variant	Exon 4 of 25	1	NM_017636.4	ENSP00000252826.4		Q8TD43-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00985

AC:

1499

AN:

152208

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0345

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00327

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00812

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00217

AC:

545

AN:

250980

AF XY:

0.00167

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0289

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00185

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000528

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00196

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000823

AC:

1202

AN:

1461022

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000728

AC XY:

529

AN XY:

726898

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0279

AC:

917

AN:

32866

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00230

AC:

103

AN:

44710

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.0000383

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000580

AC:

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53268

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00139

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000459

AC:

AN:

1111974

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00194

AC:

117

AN:

60346

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.472

Heterozygous variant carriers

146

218

291

364

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

128

160

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00984

AC:

1499

AN:

152326

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00937

AC XY:

698

AN XY:

74486

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0344

AC:

1429

AN:

41548

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00320

AC:

AN:

15312

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5178

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000207

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10624

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000441

AC:

AN:

68040

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00803

AC:

AN:

2116

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.482

Heterozygous variant carriers

133

200

266

333

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00242

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0113

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.0395

AC:

174

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000116

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00330

AC:

401

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000164

EpiControl

AF:

0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:3

Oct 14, 2016

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Apr 09, 2025

Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 04, 2024

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:2

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Nov 07, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Progressive familial heart block type IB

Benign:2

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Jul 16, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.12

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.49

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.45

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.62

D;.

Eigen

Benign

-0.26

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.42

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.044

LIST_S2

Benign

0.80

T;T

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0047

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

MutationAssessor

Benign

2.0

M;M

PhyloP100

0.21

PrimateAI

Benign

0.43

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-2.8

D;D

REVEL

Benign

0.11

Sift

Benign

0.032

D;D

Sift4G

Benign

0.066

T;T

Polyphen

0.98

D;D

Vest4

0.48

MVP

0.75

MPC

0.80

ClinPred

0.026

GERP RS

2.1

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Varity_R

0.12

gMVP

0.35

Mutation Taster

=93/7

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over