NM_017777.4:c.515+12C>T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_017777.4(MKS1):​c.515+12C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000428 in 1,603,268 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00039 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00043 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

MKS1
NM_017777.4 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.382

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MKS1 (HGNC:7121): (MKS transition zone complex subunit 1) The protein encoded by this gene localizes to the basal body and is required for formation of the primary cilium in ciliated epithelial cells. Mutations in this gene result in Meckel syndrome type 1 and in Bardet-Biedl syndrome type 13. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]
MKS1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Meckel syndrome, type 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Myriad Women’s Health, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • Bardet-Biedl syndrome 13
    Inheritance: Unknown, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, G2P
  • Joubert syndrome 28
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • Bardet-Biedl syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Joubert syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Joubert syndrome with ocular defect
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Meckel syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).
BP6
Variant 17-58214729-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-58214729-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 260885.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. GnomAdExome4 allele frequency = 0.000432 (627/1451030) while in subpopulation MID AF = 0.0118 (68/5766). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00954. There are 3 homozygotes in GnomAdExome4. There are 328 alleles in the male GnomAdExome4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 30. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AR,Unknown gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MKS1NM_017777.4 linkc.515+12C>T intron_variant Intron 5 of 17 ENST00000393119.7 NP_060247.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MKS1ENST00000393119.7 linkc.515+12C>T intron_variant Intron 5 of 17 1 NM_017777.4 ENSP00000376827.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000394
AC:
60
AN:
152120
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000412
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00191
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000641
AC:
154
AN:
240228
AF XY:
0.000642
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000658
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00198
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000599
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000449
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00268
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000432
AC:
627
AN:
1451030
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000454
AC XY:
328
AN XY:
722026
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000359
AC:
12
AN:
33410
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00193
AC:
86
AN:
44590
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000498
AC:
13
AN:
26084
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39586
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000373
AC:
32
AN:
85720
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
44610
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0118
AC:
68
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000304
AC:
338
AN:
1111016
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00129
AC:
78
AN:
60248
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.486
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
36
72
109
145
181
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000394
AC:
60
AN:
152238
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000403
AC XY:
30
AN XY:
74430
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000144
AC:
6
AN:
41540
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00131
AC:
20
AN:
15302
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5190
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000414
AC:
2
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10584
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000412
AC:
28
AN:
68006
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00189
AC:
4
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.481
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3
6
8
11
14
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000726
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000484

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Sep 06, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Meckel syndrome, type 1 Uncertain:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Bardet-Biedl syndrome 13 Uncertain:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Joubert syndrome Benign:1
Jan 13, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.82
CADD
Benign
2.9
DANN
Benign
0.82
PhyloP100
-0.38
PromoterAI
0.0020
Neutral
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.11
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs372527189; hg19: chr17-56292090; API