NM_017950.4:c.1440+16G>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_017950.4(CCDC40):c.1440+16G>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,854 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_017950.4 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- primary ciliary dyskinesia 15Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, ClinGen, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
- primary ciliary dyskinesiaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- autoimmune diseaseInheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCDC40 | NM_017950.4 | c.1440+16G>T | intron_variant | Intron 9 of 19 | ENST00000397545.9 | NP_060420.2 | ||
| LOC124904074 | XR_007065931.1 | n.795C>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 2 of 2 | ||||
| CCDC40 | NM_001243342.2 | c.1440+16G>T | intron_variant | Intron 9 of 17 | NP_001230271.1 | |||
| CCDC40 | NM_001330508.2 | c.1440+16G>T | intron_variant | Intron 9 of 10 | NP_001317437.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000401 AC: 1AN: 249494 AF XY: 0.00000739 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461854Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727230 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at