NM_030665.4:c.4311T>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_030665.4(RAI1):c.4311T>C(p.Pro1437Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0651 in 1,612,960 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5,087 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_030665.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Smith-Magenis syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, ClinGen, Orphanet
- Potocki-Lupski syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_030665.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAI1 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.4311T>C | p.Pro1437Pro | synonymous | Exon 3 of 6 | ENSP00000323074.4 | Q7Z5J4-1 | ||
| RAI1 | c.4311T>C | p.Pro1437Pro | synonymous | Exon 2 of 5 | ENSP00000588649.1 | ||||
| RAI1 | c.4311T>C | p.Pro1437Pro | synonymous | Exon 3 of 6 | ENSP00000625481.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.108 AC: 16435AN: 151972Hom.: 1522 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0605 AC: 15096AN: 249448 AF XY: 0.0568 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0606 AC: 88581AN: 1460870Hom.: 3553 Cov.: 37 AF XY: 0.0587 AC XY: 42660AN XY: 726728 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.108 AC: 16486AN: 152090Hom.: 1534 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.107 AC XY: 7927AN XY: 74358 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at