NM_058216.3:c.146-8A>G

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2

The NM_058216.3(RAD51C):c.146-8A>G variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000727 in 1,606,366 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 14 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00073 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00073 ( 13 hom. )

Consequence

RAD51C
NM_058216.3 splice_region, intron

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.0004251

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:2B:18

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0750

Publications

3 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

RAD51C (HGNC:9820): (RAD51 paralog C) This gene is a member of the RAD51 family. RAD51 family members are highly similar to bacterial RecA and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad51 and are known to be involved in the homologous recombination and repair of DNA. This protein can interact with other RAD51 paralogs and is reported to be important for Holliday junction resolution. Mutations in this gene are associated with Fanconi anemia-like syndrome. This gene is one of four localized to a region of chromosome 17q23 where amplification occurs frequently in breast tumors. Overexpression of the four genes during amplification has been observed and suggests a possible role in tumor progression. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2013]

RAD51C Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 3
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
Fanconi anemia complementation group O
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, ClinGen
hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Fanconi anemia
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
hereditary breast carcinoma
Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

RAD51C links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.69).

BP6

Variant 17-58694923-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-58694923-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 136156.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 13 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RAD51C	NM_058216.3 link	c.146-8A>G		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 1 of 8	ENST00000337432.9	NP_478123.1	O43502-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
RAD51C	ENST00000337432.9 link	c.146-8A>G		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 1 of 8	1	NM_058216.3	ENSP00000336701.4		O43502-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000729

AC:

111

AN:

152168

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000483

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.0259

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000206

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00239

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00128

AC:

320

AN:

250140

AF XY:

0.00122

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000642

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.0270

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000282

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00247

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000727

AC:

1057

AN:

1454198

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000722

AC XY:

523

AN XY:

724002

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000300

AC:

AN:

33284

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000224

AC:

AN:

44660

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.0299

AC:

780

AN:

26084

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39640

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86046

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53380

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000175

AC:

AN:

5728

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000132

AC:

146

AN:

1105244

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00213

AC:

128

AN:

60132

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.483

Heterozygous variant carriers

102

153

204

255

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

110

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000729

AC:

111

AN:

152168

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000726

AC XY:

AN XY:

74330

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000483

AC:

AN:

41448

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15268

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.0259

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5204

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4832

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10612

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000206

AC:

AN:

68010

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00239

AC:

AN:

2094

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.494

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00165

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000797

EpiCase

AF:

0.000654

EpiControl

AF:

0.000474

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:18

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:5

Nov 02, 2014

Leiden Open Variation Database

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:curation

Curator: Arleen D. Auerbach. Submitter to LOVD: Christine Rappaport. -

Nov 04, 2021

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 01, 2013

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Aug 13, 2021

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Fanconi anemia complementation group O

Uncertain:1Benign:3

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 09, 2016

Counsyl

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -

May 28, 2019

Mendelics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 3

Uncertain:1Benign:3

Apr 05, 2023

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is intronic and is not expected to impact mRNA splicing. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. -

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Jun 09, 2016

Counsyl

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 07, 2020

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:2

May 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

RAD51C: BP4, BS1 -

Aug 14, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Jan 15, 2015

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 29, 2017

True Health Diagnostics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer

Benign:1

Jun 04, 2021

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Fanconi anemia complementation group O;C3150659:Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 3

Benign:1

Jan 05, 2017

Counsyl

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Benign:1

Aug 18, 2022

Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.69

CADD

Benign

7.5

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.88

PhyloP100

0.075

PromoterAI

0.013

Neutral

(source)

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Benign

0.00043

dbscSNV1_RF

Benign

0.0040

SpliceAI score (max)

0.070

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over