NM_206933.4:c.12817T>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_206933.4(USH2A):c.12817T>C(p.Tyr4273His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000705 in 1,614,130 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Y4273C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_206933.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Usher syndrome type 2AInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- Usher syndrome type 2Inheritance: Unknown, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
- retinitis pigmentosa 39Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- retinitis pigmentosaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_206933.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00365 AC: 555AN: 152172Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000932 AC: 234AN: 250984 AF XY: 0.000656 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000394 AC: 576AN: 1461840Hom.: 5 Cov.: 38 AF XY: 0.000340 AC XY: 247AN XY: 727216 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00369 AC: 562AN: 152290Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00359 AC XY: 267AN XY: 74476 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at