chr1-45333615-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6
The NM_001407075.1(MUTYH):c.-23C>G variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000691 in 1,447,768 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001407075.1 5_prime_UTR
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- familial adenomatous polyposis 2Inheritance: AR, AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, G2P, Orphanet
- colorectal cancerInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
- familial ovarian cancerInheritance: AD, AR Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
- hereditary breast carcinomaInheritance: AR, AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001407075.1. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MUTYH | MANE Plus Clinical | c.158-12C>G | intron | N/A | ENSP00000518552.2 | E5KP25 | |||
| MUTYH | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.116-54C>G | intron | N/A | ENSP00000407590.2 | Q9UIF7-6 | |||
| MUTYH | TSL:1 | c.158-21C>G | intron | N/A | ENSP00000361170.3 | Q9UIF7-1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.91e-7 AC: 1AN: 1447768Hom.: 0 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.00000139 AC XY: 1AN XY: 718058 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at