chr10-119676583-C-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2
The NM_004281.4(BAG3):c.1029C>A(p.Arg343Arg) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000235 in 1,614,136 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00027 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00023 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
BAG3
NM_004281.4 synonymous
NM_004281.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.439
Genes affected
BAG3 (HGNC:939): (BAG cochaperone 3) BAG proteins compete with Hip for binding to the Hsc70/Hsp70 ATPase domain and promote substrate release. All the BAG proteins have an approximately 45-amino acid BAG domain near the C terminus but differ markedly in their N-terminal regions. The protein encoded by this gene contains a WW domain in the N-terminal region and a BAG domain in the C-terminal region. The BAG domains of BAG1, BAG2, and BAG3 interact specifically with the Hsc70 ATPase domain in vitro and in mammalian cells. All 3 proteins bind with high affinity to the ATPase domain of Hsc70 and inhibit its chaperone activity in a Hip-repressible manner. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.66).
BP6
Variant 10-119676583-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-119676583-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 381919.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=6, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=2}. Variant chr10-119676583-C-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr10-119676583-C-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.439 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000269 (41/152244) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0005 (34/68016). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000368. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 18 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 41 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000270 AC: 41AN: 152126Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
41
AN:
152126
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000207 AC: 52AN: 251476Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000228 AC XY: 31AN XY: 135914
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
52
AN:
251476
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
31
AN XY:
135914
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000232 AC: 339AN: 1461892Hom.: 0 Cov.: 78 AF XY: 0.000221 AC XY: 161AN XY: 727248
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
339
AN:
1461892
Hom.:
Cov.:
78
AF XY:
AC XY:
161
AN XY:
727248
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000269 AC: 41AN: 152244Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000242 AC XY: 18AN XY: 74454
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
41
AN:
152244
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
18
AN XY:
74454
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Oct 01, 2024 | BAG3: BP4, BP7 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 22, 2021 | - - |
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 24, 2020 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Aug 12, 2018 | - - |
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1HH Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Feb 23, 2023 | - - |
Myofibrillar myopathy 6 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Myofibrillar myopathy 6;C3151293:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1HH Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 30, 2025 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 24, 2017 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at