chr10-71793420-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_022124.6(CDH23):c.6492C>T(p.Ile2164Ile) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00425 in 1,613,958 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 237 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.022 ( 132 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0024 ( 105 hom. )
Consequence
CDH23
NM_022124.6 synonymous
NM_022124.6 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.568
Genes affected
CDH23 (HGNC:13733): (cadherin related 23) This gene is a member of the cadherin superfamily, whose genes encode calcium dependent cell-cell adhesion glycoproteins. The encoded protein is thought to be involved in stereocilia organization and hair bundle formation. The gene is located in a region containing the human deafness loci DFNB12 and USH1D. Usher syndrome 1D and nonsyndromic autosomal recessive deafness DFNB12 are caused by allelic mutations of this cadherin-like gene. Upregulation of this gene may also be associated with breast cancer. Alternative splice variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, May 2013]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.54).
BP6
Variant 10-71793420-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-71793420-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 46012.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr10-71793420-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.568 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0749 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH23 | NM_022124.6 | c.6492C>T | p.Ile2164Ile | synonymous_variant | 48/70 | ENST00000224721.12 | NP_071407.4 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH23 | ENST00000224721.12 | c.6492C>T | p.Ile2164Ile | synonymous_variant | 48/70 | 5 | NM_022124.6 | ENSP00000224721.9 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0223 AC: 3397AN: 152154Hom.: 132 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
3397
AN:
152154
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00570 AC: 1419AN: 249018Hom.: 38 AF XY: 0.00450 AC XY: 608AN XY: 135140
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1419
AN:
249018
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
608
AN XY:
135140
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00237 AC: 3464AN: 1461686Hom.: 105 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00208 AC XY: 1509AN XY: 727132
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
3464
AN:
1461686
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
1509
AN XY:
727132
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0223 AC: 3401AN: 152272Hom.: 132 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0218 AC XY: 1624AN XY: 74448
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
3401
AN:
152272
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
1624
AN XY:
74448
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
20
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Jan 10, 2011 | Ile2164Ile in exon 48 of CDH23: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located near a splice junction, was identified in 8/50 (16%) Black individuals (rs41281332), and is predicted to be a benign polymorphism in the UMD database. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 16, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Usher syndrome type 1D Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Usher syndrome type 1 Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 12 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at