chr11-61437820-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 16 ACMG points: 16P and 0B. PS1_Very_StrongPM2PM5PP3_Strong
The NM_017841.4(SDHAF2):c.232G>C(p.Gly78Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 14/22 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as not provided (no stars). Another nucleotide change resulting in the same amino acid substitution has been previously reported as Pathogenic in ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G78E) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_017841.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- hereditary pheochromocytoma-paragangliomaInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
- pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma syndrome 2Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 16 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_017841.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SDHAF2 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.232G>C | p.Gly78Arg | missense | Exon 2 of 4 | ENSP00000301761.3 | Q9NX18 | ||
| ENSG00000256591 | TSL:4 | c.232G>C | p.Gly78Arg | missense | Exon 2 of 5 | ENSP00000443130.1 | F5H5T6 | ||
| SDHAF2 | c.325G>C | p.Gly109Arg | missense | Exon 3 of 5 | ENSP00000519256.1 | A0AAQ5BH90 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at