chr13-32340251-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBP6

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.5896C>T(p.His1966Tyr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000459 in 1,613,906 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. H1966L) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000020 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000049 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.323

Publications

14 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

BRCA2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
Fanconi anemia complementation group D1
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, G2P
pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 2
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
sarcoma
Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Fanconi anemia
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
medulloblastoma
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

BRCA2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.2051225).

BP6

Variant 13-32340251-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32340251-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 38005.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA2	NM_000059.4 link	c.5896C>T	p.His1966Tyr	missense_variant	Exon 11 of 27	ENST00000380152.8	NP_000050.3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein
BRCA2	ENST00000380152.8 link	c.5896C>T	p.His1966Tyr	missense_variant	Exon 11 of 27	5	NM_000059.4	ENSP00000369497.3
BRCA2	ENST00000530893.7 link	c.5527C>T	p.His1843Tyr	missense_variant	Exon 11 of 27	1		ENSP00000499438.2
BRCA2	ENST00000614259.2 link	n.5896C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 10 of 26	2		ENSP00000506251.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000197

AC:

AN:

152174

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000120

AC:

AN:

250972

AF XY:

0.00000736

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000264

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000486

AC:

AN:

1461732

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000440

AC XY:

AN XY:

727170

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000299

AC:

AN:

33472

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44722

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26128

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39666

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86248

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53414

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000621

AC:

AN:

1111926

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000166

AC:

AN:

60390

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.469

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000197

AC:

AN:

152174

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000404

AC XY:

AN XY:

74332

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41440

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15282

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5198

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10612

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000441

AC:

AN:

68024

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2090

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.558

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0000510

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000189

ExAC

AF:

0.00000824

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:11

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2

Uncertain:3Benign:1

May 01, 2017

Counsyl

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -

Feb 20, 2004

Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 11, 2010

Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 02, 2020

BRCAlab, Lund University

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:4

Oct 05, 2020

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Apr 10, 2017

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 26, 2015

Vantari Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 23, 2023

University of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:curation

Missense variant in a coldspot region where missense variants are very unlikely to be pathogenic (PMID:31911673). -

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Feb 28, 2021

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

The BRCA2 c.5896C>T; p.His1966Tyr variant (rs80358822) is reported in the literature in a large cohort of individuals with a personal or family history of breast or ovarian cancer, but no specific phenotype data is available (Caux-Moncoutier 2011). This variant is reported in ClinVar (Variation ID: 38005), and is only observed on four alleles in the Genome Aggregation Database, indicating it is not a common polymorphism. The histidine at codon 1966 is weakly conserved, and computational analyses are uncertain whether this variant is neutral or deleterious (REVEL: 0.184). Due to limited information, the clinical significance of the p.His1966Tyr variant is uncertain at this time. -

Aug 25, 2022

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Aug 04, 2021

St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 20, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:2

Jul 30, 2024

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: BRCA2 c.5896C>T (p.His1966Tyr) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 1.2e-05 in 250972 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.5896C>T has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with cancer phenotypes without strong evidence for causality (e.g. Spearman_2008, Caux-Montcoutier_2011, Lu_2015). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variants have been reported in two internal samples (BRCA1 c.213-11T>G; BRIP1 c.2392C>T, p.Arg798X), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 18824701, 21120943, 25348012, 26689913). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 38005). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -

Nov 02, 2017

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Inherited breast cancer and ovarian cancer

Benign:1

Jun 26, 2024

Genomics and Molecular Medicine Service, East Genomic Laboratory Hub, NHS Genomic Medicine Service

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

BS3,BP1,BP4 -

Malignant tumor of breast

Benign:1

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

The BRCA2 p.His1966Tyr variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the Cosmic, Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database, databases. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs80358822) as With other allele, ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Invitae, GeneDx, Vantari Genetics, SCRP; classified as uncertain significance by Ambry Genetics, BIC), Clinvitae (conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity), MutDB, LOVD 3.0 (3X predicted neutral), UMD-LSDB (4X unclassified variant), BIC Database (5X with unknown clinical significance), ARUP Laboratories (uncertain significance), databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 3 of 277056 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.000011 (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The p.His1966 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. The variant is located with the Breast cancer type 2 susceptibility protein functional domain increasing the likelihood that it may have clinical significance. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.082

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.17

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.47

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.97

Eigen

Benign

-0.88

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.85

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.14

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.15

MetaRNN

Benign

0.21

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.87

PhyloP100

0.32

PrimateAI

Benign

0.28

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.97

N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.18

Sift

Uncertain

0.0010

D;D

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.022

D;D

Vest4

0.32

MutPred

0.29

Loss of disorder (P = 0.0514);Loss of disorder (P = 0.0514);

MVP

0.83

MPC

0.022

ClinPred

0.12

GERP RS

3.6

gMVP

0.15

Mutation Taster

=88/12

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over