chr13-32396905-A-G

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_Strong

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.9509A>G(p.Asp3170Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000929 in 1,613,984 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D3170N) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000096 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:2B:17

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.328

Publications

14 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

BRCA2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
Fanconi anemia complementation group D1
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, G2P
pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 2
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
sarcoma
Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Fanconi anemia
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
medulloblastoma
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

BRCA2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.23257378).

BP6

Variant 13-32396905-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32396905-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 52861.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA2	NM_000059.4 link	c.9509A>G	p.Asp3170Gly	missense_variant	Exon 26 of 27	ENST00000380152.8	NP_000050.3	P51587

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA2	ENST00000380152.8 link	c.9509A>G	p.Asp3170Gly	missense_variant	Exon 26 of 27	5	NM_000059.4	ENSP00000369497.3	P51587
BRCA2	ENST00000530893.7 link	c.9140A>G	p.Asp3047Gly	missense_variant	Exon 26 of 27	1		ENSP00000499438.2	A0A590UJI7
BRCA2	ENST00000614259.2 link	n.*1567A>G		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 25 of 26	2		ENSP00000506251.1	A0A7P0TAP7
BRCA2	ENST00000614259.2 link	n.*1567A>G		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 25 of 26	2		ENSP00000506251.1	A0A7P0TAP7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00000657

AC:

AN:

152202

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00000398

AC:

AN:

251308

AF XY:

0.00

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000880

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00000958

AC:

AN:

1461782

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000138

AC XY:

AN XY:

727194

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33476

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44722

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26132

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39676

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53404

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000117

AC:

AN:

1111960

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000166

AC:

AN:

60388

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.504

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00000657

AC:

AN:

152202

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00

AC XY:

AN XY:

74354

show subpopulations

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41444

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15280

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5206

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4832

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10618

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

68030

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2092

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5. (p-value = 0), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.375

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Alfa

AF:

0.0000358

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000113

ExAC

AF:

0.00000824

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:17

Revision: reviewed by expert panel

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:5

Aug 06, 2016

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 13, 2021

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: BRCA2 c.9509A>G (p.Asp3170Gly) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the OB3 fold (IPR015188) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4e-06 in 251308 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. In a recent large study evaluating breast cancer cases and controls in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC), the variant was reported in 3/60466 cases, but was also found in 4/53461 controls (Dorling_2021 through LOVD). Publications also reported experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function, and demonstrated similar homology-directed DNA damage repair (HDR) activity to the wild-type (Mesman_2018, Guidugli_2018). Multifactorial probability models, performing systematic assessments of variants of unknown significance in the BRCA genes, which included analysis of co-occurrence in trans with known deleterious mutations, personal and family history of cancer, tumor pathology and co-segregation with disease in pedigrees, predicted this variant to be neutral (Easton 2007 and Lindor 2012). Karchin_2008 classified variant as neutral based on protein likelihood ratio classification. Seven other submitters, including an expert panel (ENIGMA), have provided clinical-significance assessments for this variant in ClinVar after 2014, and classified the variant as likely benign (n=4) / benign (n=3; including the expert panel). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 29, 2021

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2

Uncertain:1Benign:2

May 29, 2002

Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 10, 2015

Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)

Significance:Benign

Review Status:reviewed by expert panel

Collection Method:curation

IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.0000264 -

Dec 18, 2023

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:3

Jun 01, 2022

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

BRCA2: BP1, BP4, BS3:Supporting -

Feb 09, 2019

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24323938, 21990134, 17924331, 18951446, 19043619, 18951436, 29394989, 29988080, 29884841) -

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:3

Nov 19, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Jan 19, 2022

Sema4, Sema4

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:curation

- -

Sep 11, 2017

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Sep 12, 2022

Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 26, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer

Benign:1

Nov 29, 2021

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

BRCA2-related disorder

Benign:1

Nov 06, 2023

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Malignant tumor of breast

Benign:1

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

The BRCA2 p.Asp3170Gly variant was identified in the literature however the frequency of this variant in an affected population was not provided (Easton 2007, Karchin 2008, Guidugli 2018, Lindor 2012). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs80359224) as "With other allele", in ClinVar (classified as benign by Ambry Genetics, ENIGMA, Quest Diagnostics, and ARUP Laboratories; as likely benign by Gene Dx, Color; and as uncertain significance by BIC and Integrated Genetics), LOVD 3.0 (7 entries), and UMD-LSDB (2 entries). The variant was identified in control databases in 1 of 246074 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.000004 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: European Non-Finnish in 1 of 111560 chromosomes (freq: 0.000009), while the variant was not observed in the African, Other, Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish, and South Asian populations. Several variant model prediction programs conclude that the p.Asp3170Gly variant is not pathogenic (Easton 2007, Karchin 2008, Lindor 2012). A homology-directed DNA repair (HDR) assay in V-C8 cultured cells concluded that this variant was comparable to wild type and was classified as neutral (Guidugli 2018). The Asp3170 residue is not conserved in mammals and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.092

BayesDel_addAF

Pathogenic

0.17

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

0.0

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.95

Eigen

Benign

-0.82

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.84

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.075

M_CAP

Benign

0.057

MetaRNN

Benign

0.23

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.80

PhyloP100

0.33

PrimateAI

Benign

0.38

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.6

N;N

REVEL

Uncertain

0.55

Sift

Benign

0.12

T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.18

T;T

Vest4

0.34

MutPred

0.68

Loss of stability (P = 0.0667);Loss of stability (P = 0.0667);

MVP

0.85

MPC

0.023

ClinPred

0.040

GERP RS

0.42

gMVP

0.38

Mutation Taster

=88/12

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over