chr13-51974814-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2_Supporting
The NM_000053.4(ATP7B):āc.406A>Gā(p.Arg136Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000147 in 1,614,210 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000053.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATP7B | NM_000053.4 | c.406A>G | p.Arg136Gly | missense_variant | 2/21 | ENST00000242839.10 | NP_000044.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATP7B | ENST00000242839.10 | c.406A>G | p.Arg136Gly | missense_variant | 2/21 | 1 | NM_000053.4 | ENSP00000242839 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000788 AC: 12AN: 152206Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000309 AC: 77AN: 249348Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000407 AC XY: 55AN XY: 135272
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000155 AC: 226AN: 1461886Hom.: 3 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000210 AC XY: 153AN XY: 727242
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000788 AC: 12AN: 152324Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000940 AC XY: 7AN XY: 74486
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Wilson disease Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Aug 10, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Sep 28, 2022 | Variant summary: ATP7B c.406A>G (p.Arg136Gly) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00031 in 249348 control chromosomes (gnomAD), predominantly at a frequency of 0.0025 within the South Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database. This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in ATP7B causing Wilson Disease (0.00031 vs 0.0054), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.406A>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Wilson Disease (Mukherjee_2014), Bipolar Disorder (Sriretnakumar_2019) and Neuroinflammation (McCreary_2019). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Wilson Disease. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Three ClinVar submitters have assessed the variant since 2014: one classified the variant as uncertain significance and two as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at