chr14-102015242-C-T

Variant names:

• chr14-102015242-C-T
• rs376471830
• NM_001376.5:c.7152C>T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_Moderate BP6_Very_Strong BP7 BS1 BS2

The NM_001376.5(DYNC1H1):​c.7152C>T​(p.Ser2384Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000663 in 1,614,244 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.00012 (0 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.000060 (0 hom.)
• Consequence: DYNC1H1 NM_001376.5 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 3.34
• Publications: 0 publications found

Genes affected

DYNC1H1 (HGNC:2961): (dynein cytoplasmic 1 heavy chain 1) Dyneins are a group of microtubule-activated ATPases that function as molecular motors. They are divided into two subgroups of axonemal and cytoplasmic dyneins. The cytoplasmic dyneins function in intracellular motility, including retrograde axonal transport, protein sorting, organelle movement, and spindle dynamics. Molecules of conventional cytoplasmic dynein are comprised of 2 heavy chain polypeptides and a number of intermediate and light chains.This gene encodes a member of the cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain family. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

DYNC1H1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

• autosomal dominant childhood-onset proximal spinal muscular atrophy without contractures

  Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp
• intellectual disability, autosomal dominant 13

  Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
• neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor

  Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
• Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2O

  Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
• autosomal dominant non-syndromic intellectual disability

  Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

ACMG classification

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.23).
• BP6: Variant 14-102015242-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-102015242-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 472548.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=3.34 with no splicing effect.
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000125 (19/152354) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.0027 (14/5190). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00163. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 13 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
• BS2: High AC in GnomAd4 at 19 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DYNC1H1	NM_001376.5	c.7152C>T	p.Ser2384Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 35 of 78	ENST00000360184.10	NP_001367.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
DYNC1H1	ENST00000360184.10	c.7152C>T	p.Ser2384Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 35 of 78	1	NM_001376.5	ENSP00000348965.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000118 AC: 18 AN: 152236 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.000131

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00250

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.000620

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.00

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00

GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000294 AC: 74 AN: 251434 AF XY: 0.000294

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.0000616

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00370

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000602 AC: 88 AN: 1461890 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000646 AC XY: 47 AN XY: 727246

African (AFR) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 33480

American (AMR) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 44722

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 26136

East Asian (EAS) AF: 0.00154 AC: 61 AN: 39700

South Asian (SAS) AF: 0.000162 AC: 14 AN: 86258

European-Finnish (FIN) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 53420

Middle Eastern (MID) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE) AF: 8.99e-7 AC: 1 AN: 1112010

Other (OTH) AF: 0.000199 AC: 12 AN: 60396

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000125 AC: 19 AN: 152354 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000174 AC XY: 13 AN XY: 74502

African (AFR) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 41584

American (AMR) AF: 0.000131 AC: 2 AN: 15300

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 3470

East Asian (EAS) AF: 0.00270 AC: 14 AN: 5190

South Asian (SAS) AF: 0.000621 AC: 3 AN: 4834

European-Finnish (FIN) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 10628

Middle Eastern (MID) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 294

European-Non Finnish (NFE) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 68026

Other (OTH) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 2116

Alfa AF: 0.0000712 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.000106

Asia WGS AF: 0.000866 AC: 3 AN: 3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2O Benign:2

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jan 31, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1

Nov 02, 2016

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not provided Benign:1

Jun 22, 2022

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.23
CADD	Benign	13
DANN	Benign	0.80
PhyloP100		3.3
RBP_binding_hub_radar		0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar		1.8

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs376471830; hg19: chr14-102481579;