chr14-21294785-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points: 2P and 0B. PM2
The NM_020366.4(RPGRIP1):c.194G>C(p.Trp65Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000208 in 1,443,720 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_020366.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- cone-rod dystrophy 13Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, G2P
- Leber congenital amaurosis 6Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- cone-rod dystrophyInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Leber congenital amaurosisInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_020366.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RPGRIP1 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.194G>C | p.Trp65Ser | missense | Exon 3 of 25 | ENSP00000382895.2 | Q96KN7-1 | ||
| RPGRIP1 | TSL:5 | c.194G>C | p.Trp65Ser | missense | Exon 2 of 24 | ENSP00000451219.1 | G3V3F7 | ||
| RPGRIP1 | TSL:5 | c.194G>C | p.Trp65Ser | missense | Exon 2 of 21 | ENSP00000450445.1 | G3V236 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 30
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000208 AC: 3AN: 1443720Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000279 AC XY: 2AN XY: 718062 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 30
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at