chr15-51208638-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000103.4(CYP19A1):c.*2170G>A variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.242 in 151,914 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4,751 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.24 ( 4751 hom., cov: 30)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0 ( 0 hom. )
Failed GnomAD Quality Control
Consequence
CYP19A1
NM_000103.4 3_prime_UTR
NM_000103.4 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.781
Genes affected
CYP19A1 (HGNC:2594): (cytochrome P450 family 19 subfamily A member 1) This gene encodes a member of the cytochrome P450 superfamily of enzymes. The cytochrome P450 proteins are monooxygenases which catalyze many reactions involved in drug metabolism and synthesis of cholesterol, steroids and other lipids. This protein localizes to the endoplasmic reticulum and catalyzes the last steps of estrogen biosynthesis. Mutations in this gene can result in either increased or decreased aromatase activity; the associated phenotypes suggest that estrogen functions both as a sex steroid hormone and in growth or differentiation. Alternative promoter use and alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants that have different tissue specificities. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2016]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.87).
BP6
Variant 15-51208638-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-51208638-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 316447.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.33 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYP19A1 | NM_000103.4 | c.*2170G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 10/10 | ENST00000396402.6 | ||
MIR4713HG | NR_146310.1 | n.195-69345C>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYP19A1 | ENST00000396402.6 | c.*2170G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 10/10 | 1 | NM_000103.4 | P1 | ||
MIR4713HG | ENST00000559909.1 | n.195-69345C>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.242 AC: 36727AN: 151796Hom.: 4746 Cov.: 30
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
36727
AN:
151796
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0 AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 2Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 2
GnomAD4 exome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
2
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
2
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.242 AC: 36770AN: 151914Hom.: 4751 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.242 AC XY: 17979AN XY: 74246
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
36770
AN:
151914
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
17979
AN XY:
74246
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
884
AN:
3476
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Aromatase deficiency Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at