chr15-73323420-C-T

Position:

chr15-73323420-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_005477.3(HCN4):c.2673G>A(p.Ser891=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00114 in 1,604,210 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 21 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0061 ( 13 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00062 ( 8 hom. )

Consequence

HCN4
NM_005477.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -5.19

Variant links:

Genes affected

HCN4 (HGNC:16882): (hyperpolarization activated cyclic nucleotide gated potassium channel 4) This gene encodes a member of the hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated potassium channels. The encoded protein shows slow kinetics of activation and inactivation, and is necessary for the cardiac pacemaking process. This channel may also mediate responses to sour stimuli. Mutations in this gene have been linked to sick sinus syndrome 2, also known as atrial fibrillation with bradyarrhythmia or familial sinus bradycardia. Two pseudogenes have been identified on chromosome 15. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

HCN4 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).

BP6

Variant 15-73323420-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-73323420-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 221020.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-73323420-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-5.19 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00612 (926/151310) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0214 (881/41172). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0202. There are 13 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 425 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 926 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
HCN4	NM_005477.3 linkuse as main transcript	c.2673G>A	p.Ser891=	synonymous_variant	8/8	ENST00000261917.4	NP_005468.1
HCN4	XM_011521148.3 linkuse as main transcript	c.1455G>A	p.Ser485=	synonymous_variant	7/7		XP_011519450.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
HCN4	ENST00000261917.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.2673G>A	p.Ser891=	synonymous_variant	8/8	1	NM_005477.3	ENSP00000261917	P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00611

AC:

924

AN:

151196

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0214

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00171

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000210

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000148

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00817

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00154

AC:

345

AN:

224650

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00108

AC XY:

133

AN XY:

123434

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0231

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000821

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000168

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000204

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000363

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000621

AC:

902

AN:

1452900

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000555

AC XY:

401

AN XY:

722286

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0235

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000778

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000117

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000902

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00102

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00612

AC:

926

AN:

151310

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00575

AC XY:

425

AN XY:

73934

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0214

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00171

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000210

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000148

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00808

Alfa

AF:

0.00163

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00684

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00144

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)	Nov 11, 2015	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	May 01, 2015	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided

Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	not provided	Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Athena Diagnostics	Nov 21, 2018	- -

Brugada syndrome 8

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Jan 31, 2024

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Jun 15, 2016

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.82

CADD

Benign

0.078

DANN

Benign

0.47

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over