chr16-15838241-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1

The NM_002474.3(MYH11):c.12G>A(p.Lys4Lys) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00082 in 1,614,132 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00058 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00084 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

MYH11
NM_002474.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0350

Variant links:

Genes affected

MYH11 (HGNC:7569): (myosin heavy chain 11) The protein encoded by this gene is a smooth muscle myosin belonging to the myosin heavy chain family. The gene product is a subunit of a hexameric protein that consists of two heavy chain subunits and two pairs of non-identical light chain subunits. It functions as a major contractile protein, converting chemical energy into mechanical energy through the hydrolysis of ATP. A chromosomal rearrangement involving this gene is associated with acute myeloid leukemia of the M4Eo subtype. Mutations in this gene are associated with visceral myopathy, megacystis-microcolon-intestinal hypoperistalsis syndrome 2, and familial thoracic aortic aneurysm 4. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

MYH11 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.37).

BP6

Variant 16-15838241-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-15838241-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 138362.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=3, Likely_benign=7}. Variant chr16-15838241-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr16-15838241-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.035 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000578 (88/152272) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.000916 (14/15288). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000612. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 42 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MYH11	NM_002474.3 link	c.12G>A	p.Lys4Lys	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 41	ENST00000300036.6	NP_002465.1	P35749-1A0A024QZJ4
MYH11	NM_001040113.2 link	c.12G>A	p.Lys4Lys	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 43	ENST00000452625.7	NP_001035202.1	P35749-3
MYH11	NM_001040114.2 link	c.12G>A	p.Lys4Lys	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 42		NP_001035203.1	P35749-2
MYH11	NM_022844.3 link	c.12G>A	p.Lys4Lys	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 42		NP_074035.1	P35749-4A0A024QZJ6

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
MYH11	ENST00000300036.6 link	c.12G>A	p.Lys4Lys	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 41	1	NM_002474.3	ENSP00000300036.5		P35749-1
MYH11	ENST00000452625.7 link	c.12G>A	p.Lys4Lys	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 43	1	NM_001040113.2	ENSP00000407821.2		P35749-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000578

AC:

AN:

152154

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000217

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000917

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00231

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000779

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00191

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000582

AC:

145

AN:

249178

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000630

AC XY:

AN XY:

134890

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000123

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000260

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00417

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000744

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00147

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000845

AC:

1235

AN:

1461860

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000798

AC XY:

580

AN XY:

727240

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000597

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000358

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00402

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000562

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000951

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000844

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000578

AC:

AN:

152272

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000564

AC XY:

AN XY:

74452

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000217

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000916

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00231

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000779

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00189

Alfa

AF:

0.00113

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000688

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:13

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Aortic aneurysm, familial thoracic 4

Uncertain:1Benign:3

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 23, 2015

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 28, 2017

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection

Benign:3

Apr 07, 2018

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 28, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 05, 2024

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:3

Oct 06, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

MYH11: BP4, BP7 -

not specified

Benign:2

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 04, 2014

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Feb 24, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Connective tissue disorder

Benign:1

Jun 01, 2018

Center for Human Genetics, Inc, Center for Human Genetics, Inc

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.37

CADD

Benign

2.8

DANN

Benign

0.65

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over