chr16-28477603-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1

The NM_001042432.2(CLN3):c.1230G>A(p.Ala410Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000796 in 1,613,908 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00039 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00084 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CLN3
NM_001042432.2 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.00

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

CLN3 (HGNC:2074): (CLN3 lysosomal/endosomal transmembrane protein, battenin) This gene encodes a protein that is involved in lysosomal function. Mutations in this, as well as other neuronal ceroid-lipofuscinosis (CLN) genes, cause neurodegenerative diseases commonly known as Batten disease or collectively known as neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses (NCLs). Many alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

CLN3 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

inherited retinal dystrophy
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 3
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Myriad Women’s Health

CLN3 links:

ENSG00000261832 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000261832 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.72).

BP6

Variant 16-28477603-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-28477603-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 136785.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submission is: [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000388 (59/152164) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.000706 (48/68030). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000547. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 26 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CLN3	NM_001042432.2 link	c.1230G>A	p.Ala410Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 16 of 16	ENST00000636147.2	NP_001035897.1	Q13286-1A0A024QZB8

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CLN3	ENST00000636147.2 link	c.1230G>A	p.Ala410Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 16 of 16	1	NM_001042432.2	ENSP00000490105.1		Q13286-1
ENSG00000261832	ENST00000637378.1 link	c.228+4502G>A		intron_variant	Intron 4 of 9	5		ENSP00000490831.1		A0A1B0GW90

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000388

AC:

AN:

152164

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000965

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000655

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000471

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000706

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000479

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000423

AC:

106

AN:

250506

AF XY:

0.000443

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000116

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000792

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000726

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000326

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000839

AC:

1226

AN:

1461744

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000796

AC XY:

579

AN XY:

727160

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000597

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000112

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000116

AC:

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000882

AC:

AN:

53282

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000174

AC:

AN:

5760

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00102

AC:

1135

AN:

1112010

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000580

AC:

AN:

60396

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.479

Heterozygous variant carriers

151

227

302

378

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

108

162

216

270

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000388

AC:

AN:

152164

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000350

AC XY:

AN XY:

74328

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000965

AC:

AN:

41452

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000655

AC:

AN:

15256

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5194

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4828

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000471

AC:

AN:

10616

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000706

AC:

AN:

68030

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000479

AC:

AN:

2088

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.489

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000553

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000325

EpiCase

AF:

0.000327

EpiControl

AF:

0.000771

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:3

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

CLN3: BP4, BP7 -

May 02, 2014

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 3

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Aug 10, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not specified

Benign:2

Jun 07, 2013

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Jun 04, 2025

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Sep 22, 2017

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

CLN3-related disorder

Benign:1

Dec 30, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.72

CADD

Benign

0.39

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.33

PhyloP100

-3.0

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over