chr16-68801775-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BS2

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.269G>A (p.Arg90Gln) missense variant has a frequency of 0.00001989 (5 of 251,334) in the gnomAD v2.1.1 cohort, with a maximum non-founder allele frequency of 0.00004401 (5 of 113,622) in the European non-Finnish subpopulation (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). This variant has been observed in ≥10 (55) individuals without DGC, SRC tumours or LBC and whose families do not suggest HDGC (BS2; SCV000567761.3, SCV000254829.7). In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is classified as likely benign based on BS2 alone. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BS2. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA169145/MONDO:0007648/007

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000020 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000014 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CDH1
NM_004360.5 missense

Scores

19

Clinical Significance

Likely benign reviewed by expert panel U:5B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.867
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.

BS2
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
CDH1NM_004360.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.269G>A p.Arg90Gln missense_variant 3/16 ENST00000261769.10 NP_004351.1
CDH1NM_001317184.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.269G>A p.Arg90Gln missense_variant 3/15 NP_001304113.1
CDH1NM_001317185.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.-1347G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant 3/16 NP_001304114.1
CDH1NM_001317186.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.-1551G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant 3/15 NP_001304115.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CDH1ENST00000261769.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.269G>A p.Arg90Gln missense_variant 3/161 NM_004360.5 ENSP00000261769 P1P12830-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000197
AC:
3
AN:
152150
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000199
AC:
5
AN:
251334
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000368
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
135838
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000440
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000137
AC:
20
AN:
1461858
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000206
AC XY:
15
AN XY:
727238
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000171
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000197
AC:
3
AN:
152150
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000269
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
74316
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Bravo
AF:
0.00000756
ExAC
AF:
0.0000330
AC:
4
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:5
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:2Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpDec 29, 2023- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylDec 28, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsAug 22, 2023- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Mar 06, 2023This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEuropean Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN-GENTURIS), i3s - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of PortoAug 01, 2022BS2 (PMID: 30311375) -
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoDec 30, 2020- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJul 06, 2023Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; Observed in individuals with a personal or family history of breast cancer (Guindalini et al., 2022; Garcia-Pelaez et al., 2023); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24030381, 25344691, 28229982, 30287823, 32175104, 15235021, 35264596, 36436516) -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthApr 03, 2023This missense variant replaces arginine with glutamine at codon 90 of the CDH1 protein. To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with CDH1-related disorders in the literature. This variant has been identified in 5/251334 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsSep 14, 2018This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationClinGen CDH1 Variant Curation Expert PanelAug 10, 2023The c.269G>A (p.Arg90Gln) missense variant has a frequency of 0.00001989 (5 of 251,334) in the gnomAD v2.1.1 cohort, with a maximum non-founder allele frequency of 0.00004401 (5 of 113,622) in the European non-Finnish subpopulation (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). This variant has been observed in at least 10 (55) individuals without DGC, SRC tumours or LBC and whose families do not suggest HDGC (BS2; SCV000567761.3, SCV000254829.7). In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is classified as likely benign based on BS2 alone. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BS2. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.064
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.25
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.47
CADD
Benign
3.8
DANN
Benign
0.62
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.14
T;T;T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.3
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.2
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.0023
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.20
T;T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.014
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.057
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-1.7
N;.;.;.;N
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.21
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.59
N;.;.;.;N
REVEL
Benign
0.084
Sift
Benign
0.93
T;.;.;.;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.96
T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.0
B;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.13
MutPred
0.63
Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0622);Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0622);Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0622);Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0622);Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0622);
MVP
0.65
MPC
0.29
ClinPred
0.016
T
GERP RS
3.2
Varity_R
0.020
gMVP
0.12

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs587782647; hg19: chr16-68835678; COSMIC: COSV55730336; API