chr16-68801775-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BS2
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.269G>A (p.Arg90Gln) missense variant has a frequency of 0.00001989 (5 of 251,334) in the gnomAD v2.1.1 cohort, with a maximum non-founder allele frequency of 0.00004401 (5 of 113,622) in the European non-Finnish subpopulation (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). This variant has been observed in ≥10 (55) individuals without DGC, SRC tumours or LBC and whose families do not suggest HDGC (BS2; SCV000567761.3, SCV000254829.7). In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is classified as likely benign based on BS2 alone. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BS2. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA169145/MONDO:0007648/007
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004360.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH1 | NM_004360.5 | c.269G>A | p.Arg90Gln | missense_variant | 3/16 | ENST00000261769.10 | NP_004351.1 | |
CDH1 | NM_001317184.2 | c.269G>A | p.Arg90Gln | missense_variant | 3/15 | NP_001304113.1 | ||
CDH1 | NM_001317185.2 | c.-1347G>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 3/16 | NP_001304114.1 | |||
CDH1 | NM_001317186.2 | c.-1551G>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 3/15 | NP_001304115.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH1 | ENST00000261769.10 | c.269G>A | p.Arg90Gln | missense_variant | 3/16 | 1 | NM_004360.5 | ENSP00000261769 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152150Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000199 AC: 5AN: 251334Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000368 AC XY: 5AN XY: 135838
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000137 AC: 20AN: 1461858Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000206 AC XY: 15AN XY: 727238
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152150Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74316
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:2Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 29, 2023 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Dec 28, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | Aug 22, 2023 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Mar 06, 2023 | This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN-GENTURIS), i3s - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto | Aug 01, 2022 | BS2 (PMID: 30311375) - |
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Dec 30, 2020 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 06, 2023 | Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; Observed in individuals with a personal or family history of breast cancer (Guindalini et al., 2022; Garcia-Pelaez et al., 2023); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24030381, 25344691, 28229982, 30287823, 32175104, 15235021, 35264596, 36436516) - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Apr 03, 2023 | This missense variant replaces arginine with glutamine at codon 90 of the CDH1 protein. To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with CDH1-related disorders in the literature. This variant has been identified in 5/251334 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 14, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | ClinGen CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel | Aug 10, 2023 | The c.269G>A (p.Arg90Gln) missense variant has a frequency of 0.00001989 (5 of 251,334) in the gnomAD v2.1.1 cohort, with a maximum non-founder allele frequency of 0.00004401 (5 of 113,622) in the European non-Finnish subpopulation (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). This variant has been observed in at least 10 (55) individuals without DGC, SRC tumours or LBC and whose families do not suggest HDGC (BS2; SCV000567761.3, SCV000254829.7). In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is classified as likely benign based on BS2 alone. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BS2. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at