chr17-43070979-C-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points: 4P and 3B. PM1PM2BP4_ModerateBP6
The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.4935G>T(p.Arg1645Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Consequence
BRCA1
NM_007294.4 missense
NM_007294.4 missense
Scores
1
4
14
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.323
Genes affected
BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points.
PM1
In a domain BRCT 1 (size 94) in uniprot entity BRCA1_HUMAN there are 74 pathogenic changes around while only 17 benign (81%) in NM_007294.4
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.22044727).
BP6
Variant 17-43070979-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-43070979-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 868858.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, not_provided=1, Benign=2}.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | NM_007294.4 | c.4935G>T | p.Arg1645Ser | missense_variant | 15/23 | ENST00000357654.9 | NP_009225.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | ENST00000357654.9 | c.4935G>T | p.Arg1645Ser | missense_variant | 15/23 | 1 | NM_007294.4 | ENSP00000350283.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 exome
Cov.:
31
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:2Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Benign:1Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Lupski Lab, Baylor-Hopkins CMG, Baylor College of Medicine | Apr 12, 2024 | Each variant was annotated with functional scores from MAVE data which was translated into functional evidence codes. All other evidence codes and combining criteria were adhered to as closely as possible based on the ClinGen VCEP (Variant Curation Expert Panel) gene-specific recommendations. See Supplemental Figure 34 of final paper (Supp Fig. 28 in preprint: doi:10.1101/2024.04.11.24305690) for a table to see which lines of evidence we did not have data for. The ClinGen VCEPs are highly regarded as the gold-standard for gene-specific variant curation and are developed after extensive evaluation of the evidence by clinical and scientific experts for the particular gene to classify genomic variants on a spectrum from pathogenic to benign using the 2015 ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines as a backbone (PMID: 25741868). Reclassification of these VUS variants from gnomAD or All of Us focused only on variants originally prescribed as VUS in ClinVar. To ensure reproducibility, transparency, and increased throughput, all the procedures for annotating variants and assigning evidence codes were codified using Python. All code has been made freely available and is linked in the Code Availability section and all reclassified variants with evidence codes used can be found in Tables S18-19 (preprint: doi:10.1101/2024.04.11.24305690). For the MAVE data, the clinical curation and clinical strength assignment as per the ClinGen recommendations in Brnich et al. (2020) (PMID: 31892348) for or against pathogenicity or benignity of each of these MAVE datasets utilized in this study were previously published in Fayer et al. (2021) (PMID: 34793697).In brief, for BRCA1 variants, if a variant was categorized as FUNC (functional), it was assigned BS3 evidence and no PS3 evidence, whereas if it was categorized as LOF (loss of function), the variant was assigned PS3 evidence and no BS3 evidence. Variants categorized as INT (intermediate) were left unannotated. For the BRCA1 combining criteria, greater than or equal to 1 criteria of strong benign evidence was enough to reclassify the VUS as Likely Benign. This variant GRCh38:17:43070979:C>A was assigned evidence codes ['BS3', 'BP1_Strong'] and an overall classification of Benign - |
not provided, no classification provided | in vitro | Brotman Baty Institute, University of Washington | - | - - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Sep 11, 2020 | Variant summary: BRCA1 c.4935G>T (p.Arg1645Ser) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the BRCT domain (IPR001357) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant was absent in 251254 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. A different variant resulting in the same codon effect (c.4935G>C, p.R1645S) has been reported in online databases and in published studies. p.R1645S has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (e.g. Pal_2005, Haffty_2009, Nakamura_2015). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. Functional studies concluded through usage of transcriptional assays that the variant is not pathogenic (Woods_2016, Fernandes_2019). No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. However, variant c.4935G>C which results in the same codon effect (p.R1645S), is cited by eight ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) as uncertain significance and by one ClinVar submitter (evaluation after 2014) as likely benign (Variation ID: 55321). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance until additional data of clinical and/or functional importance becomes available. - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 27, 2022 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
D
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
DEOGEN2
Benign
.;T;.;.;T;.;.;.;T;.
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
N
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
.;L;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
PrimateAI
Benign
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N;.;N;.;N;N;N;N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Benign
T;D;.;T;.;D;T;T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
T;T;T;D;D;T;T;.;.;D
Polyphen
0.36, 0.010
.;B;.;.;.;.;.;.;B;.
Vest4
MVP
MPC
0.12
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at