chr17-65558520-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS2
The NM_004655.4(AXIN2):c.101C>A(p.Pro34Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000992 in 1,613,654 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P34S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004655.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- oligodontia-cancer predisposition syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- tooth agenesisInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- craniosynostosisInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AXIN2 | NM_004655.4 | c.101C>A | p.Pro34Gln | missense_variant | Exon 2 of 11 | ENST00000307078.10 | NP_004646.3 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AXIN2 | ENST00000307078.10 | c.101C>A | p.Pro34Gln | missense_variant | Exon 2 of 11 | 1 | NM_004655.4 | ENSP00000302625.5 | ||
| ENSG00000266076 | ENST00000577662.1 | n.*277C>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 4 of 7 | 2 | ENSP00000462418.1 | ||||
| ENSG00000266076 | ENST00000577662.1 | n.*277C>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 4 of 7 | 2 | ENSP00000462418.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152192Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000440 AC: 11AN: 250242 AF XY: 0.0000591 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000103 AC: 15AN: 1461462Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000165 AC XY: 12AN XY: 727026 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152192Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74336 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Oligodontia-cancer predisposition syndrome Uncertain:1
Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt AXIN2 protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 239972). This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with glutamine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 34 of the AXIN2 protein (p.Pro34Gln). This variant is present in population databases (rs770206565, gnomAD 0.04%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with AXIN2-related conditions. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at