chr17-80058609-C-T

Position:

chr17-80058609-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1

The NM_017950.4(CCDC40):c.1275C>T(p.Ala425=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000418 in 1,614,172 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0019 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00026 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

CCDC40
NM_017950.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -4.23

Variant links:

Genes affected

CCDC40 (HGNC:26090): (coiled-coil domain 40 molecular ruler complex subunit) This gene encodes a protein that is necessary for motile cilia function. It functions in correct left-right axis formation by regulating the assembly of the inner dynein arm and the dynein regulatory complexes, which control ciliary beat. Mutations in this gene cause ciliary dyskinesia type 15, a disorder due to defects in cilia motility. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2011]

CCDC40 links:

(HGNC:):

links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.59).

BP6

Variant 17-80058609-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-80058609-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 454876.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1}.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-4.23 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00188 (287/152296) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00659 (274/41562). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00595. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 128 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein
CCDC40	NM_017950.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.1275C>T	p.Ala425=	synonymous_variant	8/20	ENST00000397545.9	NP_060420.2
LOC124904074	XR_007065931.1 linkuse as main transcript	n.1182G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	2/2
CCDC40	NM_001243342.2 linkuse as main transcript	c.1275C>T	p.Ala425=	synonymous_variant	8/18		NP_001230271.1
CCDC40	NM_001330508.2 linkuse as main transcript	c.1275C>T	p.Ala425=	synonymous_variant	8/11		NP_001317437.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CCDC40	ENST00000397545.9 linkuse as main transcript	c.1275C>T	p.Ala425=	synonymous_variant	8/20	5	NM_017950.4	ENSP00000380679	P2	Q4G0X9-1
	ENST00000695611.1 linkuse as main transcript	n.1190G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	2/3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00189

AC:

288

AN:

152178

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00664

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.000865

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000882

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000958

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000513

AC:

128

AN:

249560

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000391

AC XY:

AN XY:

135402

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00646

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000116

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.000794

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000327

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000124

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000165

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000265

AC:

387

AN:

1461876

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000260

AC XY:

189

AN XY:

727236

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00636

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000179

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.000765

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000102

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000513

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00188

AC:

287

AN:

152296

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00172

AC XY:

128

AN XY:

74464

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00659

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.000865

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000882

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000948

Alfa

AF:

0.00103

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00216

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000218

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia

Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Mar 13, 2017	This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jan 22, 2024	- -

Primary ciliary dyskinesia 15

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.59

CADD

Benign

0.15

DANN

Benign

0.61

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over