Variant chr17-80110825-C-T details in Genebe, Genetics Data Aggregator

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6BP7

The NM_000152.5(GAA):c.1536C>T(p.Phe512Phe) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000192 in 1,614,112 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000026 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000018 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

GAA
NM_000152.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.25

Variant links:

Genes affected

GAA (HGNC:4065): (alpha glucosidase) This gene encodes lysosomal alpha-glucosidase, which is essential for the degradation of glycogen to glucose in lysosomes. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate multiple intermediate forms and the mature form of the enzyme. Defects in this gene are the cause of glycogen storage disease II, also known as Pompe's disease, which is an autosomal recessive disorder with a broad clinical spectrum. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]

GAA links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.37).

BP6

Variant 17-80110825-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-80110825-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 284111.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, Likely_benign=4}.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.25 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
GAA	NM_000152.5 link	c.1536C>T	p.Phe512Phe	synonymous_variant	Exon 10 of 20	ENST00000302262.8	NP_000143.2	P10253

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
GAA	ENST00000302262.8 link	c.1536C>T	p.Phe512Phe	synonymous_variant	Exon 10 of 20	1	NM_000152.5	ENSP00000305692.3		P10253

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000263

AC:

AN:

152164

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000196

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000239

AC:

AN:

251154

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000221

AC XY:

AN XY:

135864

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000868

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000653

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000881

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000185

AC:

AN:

1461830

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000234

AC XY:

AN XY:

727214

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000425

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000580

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000270

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000263

AC:

AN:

152282

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000269

AC XY:

AN XY:

74450

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000196

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Bravo

AF:

0.00000378

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Glycogen storage disease, type II

Benign:4

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	curation	Broad Center for Mendelian Genomics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard	Jan 22, 2020	The c.1536C>T (p.Phe512=) variant in GAA has not been previously reported in individuals with Glycogen Storage Disease II but has been reported as a VUS by EGL Genetic Diagnostics and a likely benign variant by Invitae and GeneDx in ClinVar (Variation ID: 284111). This variant has been identified in 0.009% (3/34582) of Latino chromosomes and 0.007% (2/30616) of South Asian chromosomes by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs143491365). Although this variant has been seen in the general population, its frequency is low enough to be consistent with a recessive carrier frequency. Computational prediction tools and conservation analyses suggest that this variant may not impact the protein, though this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. However, novel synonymous variants supported by computational evidence without raised suspicion for an impact are likely benign (Richards 2015). In summary, although additional studies are required to fully establish its clinical significance, this variant is likely benign. ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: PM2, BP4, BP7 (Richards 2015). -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Natera, Inc.	Feb 27, 2020	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genome-Nilou Lab	Jul 22, 2021	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jan 26, 2025	- -

not provided

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Aug 22, 2017

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

GeneDx

Oct 26, 2017

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.37

CADD

Benign

3.6

DANN

Benign

0.64

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.060

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over