chr17-80112907-T-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP7BP4
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The NM_000152.5:c.1920T>G variant in GAA is a synonymous (silent) variant that does not change the encoded amino acid (p.Pro640=) and is not predicted to impact splicing. This variant has not been reported as disease-causing in an individual with Pompe disease. It has been described as a polymorphism in a cohort of patients with infantile or juvenile-onset Pompe disease from Taiwan (PMID:18458862). It was also reported in two patients in a European cohort with limb-girdle muscle weakness without a second variant (PMID:29149851). Thus, there is insufficient data to apply PP4. The highest population minor allele frequency in gnomAD v3.1.2 is [0.001534] (8/5184 alleles) in East Asian population. This is higher than the ClinGen Lysosomal Diseases VCEP’s threshold for PM2_Supporting (<0.001), and lower than the threshold for BS1 (>0.005). Therefore none of the population data codes are met. This variant is a synonymous (silent) variant that is not predicted by SpliceAI to impact splicing. In addition, it occurs at a nucleotide that is not conserved as shown by PhyloP100 (-2.182) and PhastCons (0.000) (BP4, BP7). There is a ClinVar entry for this variant (Variation ID: 255358; 1-star review status) with 10 submitters classifying the variant as uncertain significance (4) or likely benign (6). In summary, this variant meets the criteria to be classified as likely benign for Pompe disease based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the ClinGen Lysosomal Diseases Variant Curation Expert panel (Specifications Version 2.0): BP4, BP7.(Classification approved by the ClinGen Lysosomal Diseases Variant Curation Expert Panel on May 7, 2024). LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA8815546/MONDO:0009290/010
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000152.5 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- glycogen storage disease IIInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
- glycogen storage disease due to acid maltase deficiency, infantile onsetInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- glycogen storage disease due to acid maltase deficiency, late-onsetInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000152.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GAA | MANE Select | c.1920T>G | p.Pro640Pro | synonymous | Exon 14 of 20 | NP_000143.2 | P10253 | ||
| GAA | c.1920T>G | p.Pro640Pro | synonymous | Exon 15 of 21 | NP_001073271.1 | P10253 | |||
| GAA | c.1920T>G | p.Pro640Pro | synonymous | Exon 14 of 20 | NP_001073272.1 | P10253 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GAA | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1920T>G | p.Pro640Pro | synonymous | Exon 14 of 20 | ENSP00000305692.3 | P10253 | ||
| GAA | TSL:1 | c.1920T>G | p.Pro640Pro | synonymous | Exon 15 of 21 | ENSP00000374665.3 | P10253 | ||
| GAA | c.1935T>G | p.Pro645Pro | synonymous | Exon 14 of 20 | ENSP00000603465.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000145 AC: 22AN: 152164Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000181 AC: 44AN: 242468 AF XY: 0.000152 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000102 AC: 149AN: 1458230Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000120 AC XY: 87AN XY: 725054 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000144 AC: 22AN: 152282Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000148 AC XY: 11AN XY: 74468 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at