chr19-36103774-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001083961.2(WDR62):​c.3946C>G​(p.Gln1316Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00561 in 1,610,452 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 26 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. Q1316Q) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0041 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0058 ( 24 hom. )

Consequence

WDR62
NM_001083961.2 missense

Scores

19

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.453

Publications

8 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
WDR62 (HGNC:24502): (WD repeat domain 62) This gene is proposed to play a role in cerebral cortical development. Mutations in this gene have been associated with microencephaly, cortical malformations, and cognitive disability. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]
WDR62 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • microcephaly 2, primary, autosomal recessive, with or without cortical malformations
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Ambry Genetics, Illumina, G2P, ClinGen
  • autosomal recessive primary microcephaly
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0041314065).
BP6
Variant 19-36103774-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-36103774-C-G is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 93539.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00405 (617/152184) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00688 (468/67984). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00637. There are 2 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 252 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
WDR62NM_001083961.2 linkc.3946C>G p.Gln1316Glu missense_variant Exon 30 of 32 ENST00000401500.7 NP_001077430.1 O43379-4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
WDR62ENST00000401500.7 linkc.3946C>G p.Gln1316Glu missense_variant Exon 30 of 32 1 NM_001083961.2 ENSP00000384792.1 O43379-4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00406
AC:
618
AN:
152062
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00155
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00327
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00547
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000565
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00955
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00690
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00335
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00401
AC:
997
AN:
248818
AF XY:
0.00398
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00142
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00419
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00329
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000664
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00658
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00573
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00578
AC:
8425
AN:
1458268
Hom.:
24
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
0.00555
AC XY:
4030
AN XY:
725558
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000837
AC:
28
AN:
33464
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00474
AC:
212
AN:
44708
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00356
AC:
93
AN:
26122
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39688
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000348
AC:
3
AN:
86236
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000895
AC:
45
AN:
50262
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00191
AC:
11
AN:
5764
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00698
AC:
7755
AN:
1111676
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00461
AC:
278
AN:
60348
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.479
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
579
1158
1737
2316
2895
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
294
588
882
1176
1470
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00405
AC:
617
AN:
152184
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00339
AC XY:
252
AN XY:
74406
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00154
AC:
64
AN:
41524
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00327
AC:
50
AN:
15302
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00547
AC:
19
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5144
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000565
AC:
6
AN:
10624
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0102
AC:
3
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00688
AC:
468
AN:
67984
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00331
AC:
7
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.498
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
35
69
104
138
173
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00598
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00466
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00566
AC:
21
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00623
AC:
24
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00204
AC:
9
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00628
AC:
54
ExAC
AF:
0.00384
AC:
466
EpiCase
AF:
0.00802
EpiControl
AF:
0.00907

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:6
May 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

WDR62: BP4, BS2 -

Feb 22, 2018
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 24, 2019
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Sep 29, 2016
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 07, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:2
Jul 18, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 30, 2015
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Microcephaly 2, primary, autosomal recessive, with or without cortical malformations Benign:2
Dec 05, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.073
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.61
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.65
CADD
Benign
7.5
DANN
Benign
0.32
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.00071
.;T
Eigen
Benign
-1.1
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.1
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.077
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.64
T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.014
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0041
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.69
.;N
PhyloP100
0.45
PrimateAI
Benign
0.27
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.12
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.024
Sift
Benign
0.48
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
1.0
T;T
Polyphen
0.0010
B;B
Vest4
0.14
MVP
0.38
MPC
0.24
ClinPred
0.0033
T
GERP RS
1.5
Varity_R
0.069
gMVP
0.11
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs35811023; hg19: chr19-36594676; COSMIC: COSV105820141; API