chr19-6709837-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_000064.4(C3):c.1692G>A(p.Val564Val) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.318 in 1,612,958 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 86,070 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000064.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome with C3 anomalyInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
- complement component 3 deficiencyInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
- C3 glomerulonephritisInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.370 AC: 56132AN: 151510Hom.: 11309 Cov.: 29 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.353 AC: 88578AN: 251044 AF XY: 0.349 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.313 AC: 457348AN: 1461330Hom.: 74758 Cov.: 45 AF XY: 0.315 AC XY: 228798AN XY: 726966 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.370 AC: 56177AN: 151628Hom.: 11312 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.373 AC XY: 27640AN XY: 74082 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
- -
- -
- -
Age related macular degeneration 9 Benign:2
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
- -
Complement component 3 deficiency Benign:2
- -
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome with C3 anomaly Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at