chr2-178529214-T-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 2P and 8B. PM1BP4_StrongBS1
The NM_001267550.2(TTN):āc.106537A>Cā(p.Lys35513Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000375 in 1,467,362 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 17/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. K35513E) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001267550.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTN | NM_001267550.2 | c.106537A>C | p.Lys35513Gln | missense_variant | Exon 360 of 363 | ENST00000589042.5 | NP_001254479.2 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTN | ENST00000589042.5 | c.106537A>C | p.Lys35513Gln | missense_variant | Exon 360 of 363 | 5 | NM_001267550.2 | ENSP00000467141.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000250 AC: 38AN: 152168Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000132 AC: 13AN: 98664 AF XY: 0.000119 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000129 AC: 17AN: 1315076Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000172 AC XY: 11AN XY: 640270 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000250 AC: 38AN: 152286Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000363 AC XY: 27AN XY: 74468 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at