chr2-178632291-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):​c.43603C>T​(p.Arg14535Cys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00545 in 1,609,396 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 717 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R14535H) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0098 ( 94 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0050 ( 623 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 missense

Scores

5
4
7

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:26

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.54

Publications

6 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]
TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0019354224).
BP6
Variant 2-178632291-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178632291-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 46971.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AMR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0846 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TTNNM_001267550.2 linkc.43603C>T p.Arg14535Cys missense_variant Exon 236 of 363 ENST00000589042.5 NP_001254479.2 A0A0A0MTS7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TTNENST00000589042.5 linkc.43603C>T p.Arg14535Cys missense_variant Exon 236 of 363 5 NM_001267550.2 ENSP00000467141.1 A0A0A0MTS7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00977
AC:
1484
AN:
151968
Hom.:
93
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00234
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0882
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000194
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000279
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0120
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0236
AC:
5721
AN:
241922
AF XY:
0.0175
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00264
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.166
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000577
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000639
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0183
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00500
AC:
7282
AN:
1457310
Hom.:
623
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00420
AC XY:
3042
AN XY:
724596
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00177
AC:
59
AN:
33410
American (AMR)
AF:
0.157
AC:
6900
AN:
44032
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0000385
AC:
1
AN:
25972
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000254
AC:
1
AN:
39342
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000585
AC:
5
AN:
85514
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53176
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5754
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000396
AC:
44
AN:
1109896
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00452
AC:
272
AN:
60214
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.470
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
302
604
905
1207
1509
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
106
212
318
424
530
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00981
AC:
1492
AN:
152086
Hom.:
94
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0106
AC XY:
790
AN XY:
74330
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00234
AC:
97
AN:
41510
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0886
AC:
1350
AN:
15244
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000194
AC:
1
AN:
5148
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10606
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000280
AC:
19
AN:
67976
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0119
AC:
25
AN:
2104
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.508
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
67
133
200
266
333
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00363
Hom.:
97
Bravo
AF:
0.0186
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000519
AC:
2
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00206
AC:
8
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000722
AC:
6
ExAC
AF:
0.0171
AC:
2061
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00462
AC:
16
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:26
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:9
Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 19, 2019
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 24, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Arg11967Cys in exon 185 of TTN: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 9.4% (12/128) of Mexican chromosome s from a broad population by the 1000 Genomes project (dbSNP rs1241771). -

Oct 11, 2012
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Jul 30, 2013
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:5
-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 30, 2019
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 24, 2013
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Apr 13, 2016
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Jan 31, 2013
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.21
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.35
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.13
CADD
Uncertain
24
DANN
Benign
0.96
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.85
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.83
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.97
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.95
D;D;D;.;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0019
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.58
T
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
3.0
.;.;.;M;.;.;M
PhyloP100
5.5
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.69
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-5.2
D;D;.;.;D;D;.
REVEL
Uncertain
0.48
Sift
Uncertain
0.0010
D;D;.;.;D;D;.
Polyphen
1.0
.;.;.;D;.;.;D
Vest4
0.38
MPC
0.54
ClinPred
0.058
T
GERP RS
6.0
Mutation Taster
=83/17
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs12471771; hg19: chr2-179497018; API