chr2-219420280-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001927.4(DES):​c.669T>C​(p.Ile223Ile) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00541 in 1,614,180 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 315 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.027 ( 171 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0032 ( 144 hom. )

Consequence

DES
NM_001927.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:20

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.155

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
DES (HGNC:2770): (desmin) This gene encodes a muscle-specific class III intermediate filament. Homopolymers of this protein form a stable intracytoplasmic filamentous network connecting myofibrils to each other and to the plasma membrane. Mutations in this gene are associated with desmin-related myopathy, a familial cardiac and skeletal myopathy (CSM), and with distal myopathies. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
DES Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • dilated cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • dilated cardiomyopathy 1I
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Ambry Genetics
  • myofibrillar myopathy 1
    Inheritance: AD, AR, SD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Ambry Genetics
  • atrioventricular block
    Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • familial isolated dilated cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • neurogenic scapuloperoneal syndrome, Kaeser type
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.51).
BP6
Variant 2-219420280-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-219420280-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 36001.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.155 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0878 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
DESNM_001927.4 linkc.669T>C p.Ile223Ile synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 9 ENST00000373960.4 NP_001918.3 P17661Q53SB5

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DESENST00000373960.4 linkc.669T>C p.Ile223Ile synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 9 1 NM_001927.4 ENSP00000363071.3 P17661
DESENST00000477226.6 linkn.143T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 2 of 8 4
DESENST00000492726.1 linkn.64T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 2 of 6 4
DESENST00000683013.1 linkn.57T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 1 of 7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0265
AC:
4030
AN:
152170
Hom.:
171
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0903
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0113
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00173
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0190
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000911
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0201
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00745
AC:
1873
AN:
251462
AF XY:
0.00561
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0911
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00682
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00149
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000914
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00522
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00321
AC:
4694
AN:
1461892
Hom.:
144
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.00275
AC XY:
2000
AN XY:
727246
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0910
AC:
3047
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00749
AC:
335
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00153
AC:
40
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000151
AC:
13
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000187
AC:
1
AN:
53418
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00659
AC:
38
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000720
AC:
801
AN:
1112012
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00694
AC:
419
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.477
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
318
636
954
1272
1590
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
110
220
330
440
550
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0265
AC:
4036
AN:
152288
Hom.:
171
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0254
AC XY:
1894
AN XY:
74474
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0902
AC:
3746
AN:
41548
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0113
AC:
173
AN:
15300
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00173
AC:
6
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5176
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000207
AC:
1
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10624
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0204
AC:
6
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000911
AC:
62
AN:
68028
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0199
AC:
42
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.498
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
183
366
548
731
914
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
42
84
126
168
210
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0125
Hom.:
38
Bravo
AF:
0.0301
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00346
AC:
12
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00109
EpiControl
AF:
0.00136

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:20
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:8
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 15, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 19, 2011
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Ile223Ile in exon 3 of DES: This variant is classified as benign because it does not change the amino acid and is frequent in the general population (rs7588268, MAF >1%). -

Mar 12, 2013
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:4
-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 15, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Desmin-related myofibrillar myopathy Benign:2
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Aug 18, 2011
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

Sep 15, 2015
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1I Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Myofibrillar Myopathy, Dominant Benign:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Neurogenic scapuloperoneal syndrome, Kaeser type Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Dec 07, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.51
CADD
Benign
11
DANN
Benign
0.88
PhyloP100
0.15
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.6
Mutation Taster
=93/7
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs75882680; hg19: chr2-220285002; API