chr2-47803646-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP6_Very_Strong
The NM_000179.3(MSH6):c.3399T>C(p.Thr1133Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000075 in 1,614,140 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000179.3 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- intellectual developmental disorder with dysmorphic facies and behavioral abnormalitiesInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, G2P
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000460 AC: 7AN: 152252Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000358 AC: 9AN: 251428 AF XY: 0.0000294 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000780 AC: 114AN: 1461888Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000701 AC XY: 51AN XY: 727246 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000460 AC: 7AN: 152252Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000538 AC XY: 4AN XY: 74386 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
- -
- -
- -
not specified Benign:3
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
- -
- -
Lynch syndrome 5 Benign:2
This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -
This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -
not provided Benign:2
The MSH6 p.Thr1133= variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the UMD-LSDB database. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs61748084) as "With Likely benign allele", and in ClinVar (classified as benign by GeneDx; as likely benign by Invitae, Ambry Genetics, Counsyl and Color). The variant was identified in control databases in 9 of 277182 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00003 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 1 of 24036 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004), Latino in 1 of 34408 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003), European in 7 of 126686 chromosomes (freq: 0.00006); it was not observed in the Other, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish, and South Asian populations. The p.Thr1133= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -
- -
Lynch syndrome Benign:1
- -
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at