chr5-113433855-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_032028.4(TSSK1B):c.985G>A(p.Glu329Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000397 in 1,614,012 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 17/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. E329D) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_032028.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_032028.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSSK1B | TSL:6 MANE Select | c.985G>A | p.Glu329Lys | missense | Exon 1 of 1 | ENSP00000375081.3 | Q9BXA7 | ||
| MCC | TSL:2 MANE Select | c.171-48643G>A | intron | N/A | ENSP00000386227.3 | P23508-2 | |||
| ENSG00000232633 | TSL:2 | n.1252C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 4 of 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000526 AC: 8AN: 152226Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000161 AC: 4AN: 249068 AF XY: 0.0000222 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000376 AC: 55AN: 1461668Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000385 AC XY: 28AN XY: 727104 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000591 AC: 9AN: 152344Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000805 AC XY: 6AN XY: 74488 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at