chr5-13870951-A-G

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001369.3(DNAH5):c.3650T>C(p.Ile1217Thr) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000293 in 1,613,818 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I1217S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0015 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00017 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

DNAH5
NM_001369.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.21

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

DNAH5 (HGNC:2950): (dynein axonemal heavy chain 5) This gene encodes a dynein protein, which is part of a microtubule-associated motor protein complex consisting of heavy, light, and intermediate chains. This protein is an axonemal heavy chain dynein. It functions as a force-generating protein with ATPase activity, whereby the release of ADP is thought to produce the force-producing power stroke. Mutations in this gene cause primary ciliary dyskinesia type 3, as well as Kartagener syndrome, which are both diseases due to ciliary defects. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]

DNAH5 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

primary ciliary dyskinesia 3
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, ClinGen
primary ciliary dyskinesia
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

DNAH5 links:

ENSG00000251423 (HGNC:40187):

ENSG00000251423 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.013110578).

BP6

Variant 5-13870951-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-13870951-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 351190.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submission is: [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00146 (222/152300) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0051 (212/41580). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00454. There are 2 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 114 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DNAH5	NM_001369.3 link	c.3650T>C	p.Ile1217Thr	missense_variant	Exon 24 of 79	ENST00000265104.5	NP_001360.1	Q8TE73

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DNAH5	ENST00000265104.5 link	c.3650T>C	p.Ile1217Thr	missense_variant	Exon 24 of 79	1	NM_001369.3	ENSP00000265104.4	Q8TE73
DNAH5	ENST00000681290.1 link	c.3605T>C	p.Ile1202Thr	missense_variant	Exon 24 of 79			ENSP00000505288.1	A0A7P0Z455
ENSG00000251423	ENST00000503244.2 link	n.253+10396A>G		intron_variant	Intron 1 of 2	4
ENSG00000251423	ENST00000637153.1 link	n.213+10436A>G		intron_variant	Intron 1 of 2	5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00145

AC:

220

AN:

152182

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00507

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000459

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000390

AC:

AN:

251006

AF XY:

0.000317

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00555

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000174

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000176

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000172

AC:

251

AN:

1461518

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000160

AC XY:

116

AN XY:

727066

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00604

AC:

202

AN:

33444

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000134

AC:

AN:

44672

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26114

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39688

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000232

AC:

AN:

86250

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53404

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000347

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000117

AC:

AN:

1111800

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000431

AC:

AN:

60380

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.487

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00146

AC:

222

AN:

152300

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00153

AC XY:

114

AN XY:

74482

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00510

AC:

212

AN:

41580

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000458

AC:

AN:

15274

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5182

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4828

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10628

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000294

AC:

AN:

68016

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000473

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.506

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Alfa

AF:

0.000514

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00171

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00409

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000527

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00173

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia

Benign:3

Nov 11, 2019

Natera, Inc.

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 21, 2022

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Jan 29, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Uncertain:1

Jun 08, 2022

GeneDx

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -

Primary ciliary dyskinesia 3

Uncertain:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

DNAH5-related disorder

Benign:1

Feb 08, 2022

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.11

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.48

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.46

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.97

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.51

Eigen

Benign

-0.26

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.20

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.89

LIST_S2

Benign

0.75

M_CAP

Benign

0.016

MetaRNN

Benign

0.013

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.1

PhyloP100

4.2

PrimateAI

Benign

0.43

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-2.5

REVEL

Benign

0.077

Sift

Uncertain

0.0080

Polyphen

0.070

Vest4

0.43

MVP

0.66

MPC

0.17

ClinPred

0.039

GERP RS

4.7

Varity_R

0.15

gMVP

0.49

Mutation Taster

=87/13

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

chr5-13870951-A-G

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over