chr6-28510778-A-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_182701.1(GPX6):c.214T>A(p.Tyr72Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0562 in 1,613,930 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2,967 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Y72C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_182701.1 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_182701.1. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPX6 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.214T>A | p.Tyr72Asn | missense | Exon 2 of 5 | ENSP00000354581.1 | P59796 | ||
| GPX6 | TSL:1 | c.214T>A | p.Tyr72Asn | missense | Exon 2 of 4 | ENSP00000417364.1 | A0A182DWH6 | ||
| GPX6 | TSL:4 | n.433T>A | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 4 of 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0493 AC: 7495AN: 152164Hom.: 226 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0447 AC: 11143AN: 249386 AF XY: 0.0439 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0570 AC: 83286AN: 1461648Hom.: 2741 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0554 AC XY: 40295AN XY: 727136 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0492 AC: 7493AN: 152282Hom.: 226 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0483 AC XY: 3597AN XY: 74466 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at