chr6-98917459-C-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_001278716.2(FBXL4):c.773G>T(p.Gly258Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000205 in 1,461,768 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001278716.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251336Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000736 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135840
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000205 AC: 3AN: 1461768Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727188
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome 13 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | reference population | Wong Mito Lab, Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine | Aug 10, 2017 | The NM_012160.4:c.773G>T (NP_036292.2:p.Gly258Val) [GRCH38: NC_000006.12:g.98917459C>A] variant in FBXL4 gene is interpretated to be a Uncertain Significance - Conflicting Evidence based on ACMG guidelines (PMID: 25741868). This variant meets one or more of the following evidence codes reported in the ACMG-guideline. PM2:This variant is absent in key population databases. BP4:Computational evidence/predictors indicate no impact on the FBXL4 structure, function, or protein-protein interaction. Based on this evidence code ClinGen Pathogenicity Calculator (PMID:28081714) suggested that the variant is Uncertain Significance - Conflicting Evidence. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at