Menu
GeneBe

chr7-21894919-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_001277115.2(DNAH11):ā€‹c.12969G>Cā€‹(p.Gln4323His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000113 in 1,614,002 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.00070 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š‘“: 0.000053 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

DNAH11
NM_001277115.2 missense

Scores

4
9

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.13
Variant links:
Genes affected
DNAH11 (HGNC:2942): (dynein axonemal heavy chain 11) This gene encodes a ciliary outer dynein arm protein and is a member of the dynein heavy chain family. It is a microtubule-dependent motor ATPase and has been reported to be involved in the movement of respiratory cilia. Mutations in this gene have been implicated in causing Kartagener Syndrome (a combination of situs inversus totalis and Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia (PCD), also called Immotile Cilia Syndrome 1 (ICS1)) and male sterility. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.03190717).
BP6
Variant 7-21894919-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-21894919-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 163128.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=2, Likely_benign=2}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
DNAH11NM_001277115.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.12969G>C p.Gln4323His missense_variant 79/82 ENST00000409508.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
DNAH11ENST00000409508.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.12969G>C p.Gln4323His missense_variant 79/825 NM_001277115.2 P1
DNAH11ENST00000479878.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.340G>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 2/53

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000697
AC:
106
AN:
152180
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00251
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000923
AC:
23
AN:
249260
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000887
AC XY:
12
AN XY:
135224
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00142
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000290
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000527
AC:
77
AN:
1461704
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000385
AC XY:
28
AN XY:
727134
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00188
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000671
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000270
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000133
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000696
AC:
106
AN:
152298
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000859
AC XY:
64
AN XY:
74480
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00250
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000304
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000797
ExAC
AF:
0.000157
AC:
19
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsApr 29, 2024This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 29, 2024- -
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineDec 27, 2013The Gln4323His variant in DNAH11 has not been previously identified in individua ls with pulmonary disease. This variant has been identified in 1/2178 chromosome s from a broad population by the 1000 Genomes Project (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.g ov/variation/tools/1000genomes/; dbSNP rs191802172). Glutamine at position 4223 is not well conserved in evolution, and the variant residue (Histidine) has been observed in one mammalian species (Egyptian Jerboa), suggesting that the change may be tolerated. Additional computational analyses (biochemical amino acid pro perties, AlignGVGD, PolyPhen2, and SIFT) do not provide strong support for or ag ainst an impact to the protein. In summary, additional information is needed to fully assess its clinical significance. -
Primary ciliary dyskinesia 7 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingRevvity Omics, RevvityMay 10, 2022- -
DNAH11-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesAug 15, 2023This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.28
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.53
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.54
CADD
Benign
22
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
Eigen
Uncertain
0.31
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.28
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.96
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.73
T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.014
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.032
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationTaster
Benign
0.81
D
PrimateAI
Benign
0.35
T
Vest4
0.28
MutPred
0.55
Gain of disorder (P = 0.2499);Gain of disorder (P = 0.2499);.;
MVP
0.32
ClinPred
0.11
T
GERP RS
4.7
Varity_R
0.63
gMVP
0.49

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.030
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs191802172; hg19: chr7-21934537; API