chr9-127854349-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_001114753.3(ENG):c.7C>T(p.Arg3Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000526 in 1,590,160 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001114753.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENG | NM_001114753.3 | c.7C>T | p.Arg3Cys | missense_variant | 1/15 | ENST00000373203.9 | NP_001108225.1 | |
ENG | NM_000118.4 | c.7C>T | p.Arg3Cys | missense_variant | 1/14 | NP_000109.1 | ||
ENG | NM_001406715.1 | c.7C>T | p.Arg3Cys | missense_variant | 1/8 | NP_001393644.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENG | ENST00000373203.9 | c.7C>T | p.Arg3Cys | missense_variant | 1/15 | 1 | NM_001114753.3 | ENSP00000362299 | P2 | |
ENG | ENST00000344849.4 | c.7C>T | p.Arg3Cys | missense_variant | 1/14 | 1 | ENSP00000341917 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000217 AC: 33AN: 152216Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000286 AC: 58AN: 202648Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000328 AC XY: 36AN XY: 109604
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000558 AC: 803AN: 1437944Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000558 AC XY: 398AN XY: 713314
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000217 AC: 33AN: 152216Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000188 AC XY: 14AN XY: 74360
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Telangiectasia, hereditary hemorrhagic, type 1 Uncertain:1Benign:3
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Knight Diagnostic Laboratories, Oregon Health and Sciences University | Jan 27, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Johns Hopkins Genomics, Johns Hopkins University | Apr 04, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | NIHR Bioresource Rare Diseases, University of Cambridge | Jan 01, 2018 | BS1 +BP2 - |
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 28, 2020 | In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 15312062, 25312062) - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2016 | - - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Mar 08, 2019 | - - |
ENG-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | May 11, 2022 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jan 11, 2022 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at