chr9-91361708-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001698.3(AUH):​c.182C>A​(p.Pro61His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000873 in 1,555,180 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 12 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0045 ( 5 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00048 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

AUH
NM_001698.3 missense

Scores

2
16

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.143

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
AUH (HGNC:890): (AU RNA binding methylglutaconyl-CoA hydratase) This gene encodes bifunctional mitochondrial protein that has both RNA-binding and hydratase activities. The encoded protein is a methylglutaconyl-CoA hydratase that catalyzes the hydration of 3-methylglutaconyl-CoA to 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA, a critical step in the leucine degradation pathway. This protein also binds AU-rich elements (AREs) found in the 3' UTRs of rapidly decaying mRNAs including c-fos, c-myc and granulocyte/ macrophage colony stimulating factor. ARE elements are involved in directing RNA to rapid degradation and deadenylation. This protein is localizes to the mitochondrial matrix and the inner mitochondrial membrane and may be involved in mitochondrial protein synthesis. Mutations in this gene are the cause of 3-methylglutaconic aciduria, type I. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2015]
AUH Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • 3-methylglutaconic aciduria type 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0039705336).
BP6
Variant 9-91361708-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-91361708-G-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 214144.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00451 (687/152268) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0159 (659/41560). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0149. There are 5 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 325 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 5 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
AUHNM_001698.3 linkc.182C>A p.Pro61His missense_variant Exon 1 of 10 ENST00000375731.9 NP_001689.1 Q13825-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
AUHENST00000375731.9 linkc.182C>A p.Pro61His missense_variant Exon 1 of 10 1 NM_001698.3 ENSP00000364883.5 Q13825-1
AUHENST00000303617.5 linkc.182C>A p.Pro61His missense_variant Exon 1 of 9 1 ENSP00000307334.5 Q13825-2
AUHENST00000478465.5 linkn.180C>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 1 of 6 3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00451
AC:
686
AN:
152152
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0159
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000982
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00382
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00115
AC:
177
AN:
153412
AF XY:
0.000800
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0191
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000929
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000682
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000695
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000478
AC:
670
AN:
1402912
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000391
AC XY:
271
AN XY:
692570
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0177
AC:
558
AN:
31608
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00108
AC:
39
AN:
36256
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
25064
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
36336
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000504
AC:
4
AN:
79422
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
48538
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000879
AC:
5
AN:
5688
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00000924
AC:
10
AN:
1081858
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000929
AC:
54
AN:
58142
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.490
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
38
76
113
151
189
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00451
AC:
687
AN:
152268
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00437
AC XY:
325
AN XY:
74442
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0159
AC:
659
AN:
41560
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000980
AC:
15
AN:
15300
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5168
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000207
AC:
1
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10612
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000588
AC:
4
AN:
68014
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00378
AC:
8
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
34
68
101
135
169
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00134
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00513
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0149
AC:
63
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000121
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.000946
AC:
105
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00115
AC:
4
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Nov 13, 2014
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Feb 29, 2016
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Sep 01, 2016
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

3-methylglutaconic aciduria type 1 Benign:2
Jan 27, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.084
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.53
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.52
CADD
Benign
15
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.17
T;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.90
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.96
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.049
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.67
T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0040
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.34
N;N
PhyloP100
-0.14
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.63
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.62
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.021
Sift
Benign
0.17
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.21
T;T
Polyphen
0.16
B;B
Vest4
0.27
MVP
0.36
MPC
0.44
ClinPred
0.016
T
GERP RS
1.8
PromoterAI
0.059
Neutral
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.0
Varity_R
0.088
gMVP
0.22
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs181327211; hg19: chr9-94123990; API