chrX-154031114-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4BP7BS1
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The allele frequency of the c.714G>A p.Gly238= variant in MECP2 is 0.008% in the African/African American sub population in gnomAD, which is high enough to meet the BS1 criteria based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen Rett/Angelman-like Expert Panel for Rett/AS-like conditions (BS1). The silent p.Gly238= variant is not predicted to affect splicing using multiple computational tools and does not affect a highly conserved nucleotide (BP4, BP7). In summary, the c.714G>A p.Gly238= variant in MECP2 is classified as Likely Benign based on the ACMG/AMP criteria (BS1, BP4, BP7). LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA205378/MONDO:0010726/032
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001110792.2 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MECP2 | NM_001110792.2 | c.750G>A | p.Gly250= | synonymous_variant | 3/3 | ENST00000453960.7 | NP_001104262.1 | |
MECP2 | NM_004992.4 | c.714G>A | p.Gly238= | synonymous_variant | 4/4 | ENST00000303391.11 | NP_004983.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MECP2 | ENST00000453960.7 | c.750G>A | p.Gly250= | synonymous_variant | 3/3 | 1 | NM_001110792.2 | ENSP00000395535 | ||
MECP2 | ENST00000303391.11 | c.714G>A | p.Gly238= | synonymous_variant | 4/4 | 1 | NM_004992.4 | ENSP00000301948 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000358 AC: 4AN: 111587Hom.: 0 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.0000591 AC XY: 2AN XY: 33819
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000273 AC: 5AN: 183258Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000590 AC XY: 4AN XY: 67772
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000701 AC: 77AN: 1098148Hom.: 0 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.0000660 AC XY: 24AN XY: 363502
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000358 AC: 4AN: 111587Hom.: 0 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.0000591 AC XY: 2AN XY: 33819
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Feb 08, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 19, 2015 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Severe neonatal-onset encephalopathy with microcephaly Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 14, 2024 | - - |
Rett syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | ClinGen Rett and Angelman-like Disorders Variant Curation Expert Panel | Jun 15, 2023 | The allele frequency of the c.714G>A p.Gly238= variant in MECP2 is 0.008% in the African/African American sub population in gnomAD, which is high enough to meet the BS1 criteria based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen Rett/Angelman-like Expert Panel for Rett/AS-like conditions (BS1). The silent p.Gly238= variant is not predicted to affect splicing using multiple computational tools and does not affect a highly conserved nucleotide (BP4, BP7). In summary, the c.714G>A p.Gly238= variant in MECP2 is classified as Likely Benign based on the ACMG/AMP criteria (BS1, BP4, BP7). - |
MECP2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Feb 08, 2022 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at