rs1021307133

Variant names:

• chr11-32435202-G-A
• rs1021307133
• NM_024426.6:c.159C>T

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

• chr11-32435202-G-A
• chr11-32435202-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 2P and 13B. PM2 BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BP7

The NM_024426.6(WT1):​c.159C>T​(p.Ala53Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000029 in 1,379,606 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: not found (cov: 30)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000029 (0 hom.)
• Consequence: WT1 NM_024426.6 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:3
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.438

Genes affected

WT1 (HGNC:12796): (WT1 transcription factor) This gene encodes a transcription factor that contains four zinc-finger motifs at the C-terminus and a proline/glutamine-rich DNA-binding domain at the N-terminus. It has an essential role in the normal development of the urogenital system, and it is mutated in a small subset of patients with Wilms tumor. This gene exhibits complex tissue-specific and polymorphic imprinting pattern, with biallelic, and monoallelic expression from the maternal and paternal alleles in different tissues. Multiple transcript variants have been described. In several variants, there is evidence for the use of a non-AUG (CUG) translation initiation codon upstream of, and in-frame with the first AUG. Authors of PMID:7926762 also provide evidence that WT1 mRNA undergoes RNA editing in human and rat, and that this process is tissue-restricted and developmentally regulated. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2015]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.

• PM2: Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage
• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.87).
• BP6: Variant 11-32435202-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-32435202-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 543150.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.438 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
WT1	NM_024426.6	c.159C>T	p.Ala53Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 1 of 10	ENST00000452863.10	NP_077744.4

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
WT1	ENST00000452863.10	c.159C>T	p.Ala53Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 1 of 10	1	NM_024426.6	ENSP00000415516.5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 30

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000230 AC: 3 AN: 130162 Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0 AN XY: 71282

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.0000406

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.0000409

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000290 AC: 4 AN: 1379606 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 44 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0 AN XY: 680196

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.0000558

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.00000186

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 30

Bravo AF: 0.0000113

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

11p partial monosomy syndrome;C0950121:Drash syndrome;C0950122:Frasier syndrome;CN033288:Wilms tumor 1 Benign:1

Apr 10, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1

Dec 01, 2024

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Wilms tumor 1 Benign:1

Dec 18, 2023

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.87
CADD	Benign	5.4
DANN	Benign	0.81

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1021307133; hg19: chr11-32456748;