rs112935966

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_013296.5(GPSM2):​c.87G>A​(p.Leu29Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00212 in 1,614,038 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 58 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.011 ( 25 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0012 ( 33 hom. )

Consequence

GPSM2
NM_013296.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 8.02

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
GPSM2 (HGNC:29501): (G protein signaling modulator 2) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to a family of proteins that modulate activation of G proteins, which transduce extracellular signals received by cell surface receptors into integrated cellular responses. The N-terminal half of this protein contains 10 copies of leu-gly-asn (LGN) repeat, and the C-terminal half contains 4 GoLoco motifs, which are involved in guanine nucleotide exchange. This protein may play a role in neuroblast division and in the development of normal hearing. Mutations in this gene are associated with autosomal recessive nonsyndromic deafness (DFNB82). Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2016]
CLCC1 (HGNC:29675): (chloride channel CLIC like 1) Predicted to enable chloride channel activity. Predicted to be involved in chloride transport. Located in endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria-associated endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Implicated in retinitis pigmentosa 32. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]
AKNAD1 (HGNC:28398): (AKNA domain containing 1) This gene encodes a protein which contains a domain found in an AT-hook-containing transcription factor. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, May 2012]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.3).
BP6
Variant 1-108896894-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-108896894-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 45572.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0113 (1714/152308) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.039 (1623/41566). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0375. There are 25 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 790 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 25 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
GPSM2NM_013296.5 linkc.87G>A p.Leu29Leu synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 15 ENST00000264126.9 NP_037428.3 P81274A0A024R0F8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
GPSM2ENST00000264126.9 linkc.87G>A p.Leu29Leu synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 15 1 NM_013296.5 ENSP00000264126.3 P81274

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0112
AC:
1697
AN:
152192
Hom.:
25
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0387
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00399
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000103
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00956
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00295
AC:
741
AN:
251436
AF XY:
0.00204
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0412
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00159
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000440
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00195
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00117
AC:
1709
AN:
1461730
Hom.:
33
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000976
AC XY:
710
AN XY:
727174
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0421
AC:
1408
AN:
33472
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00195
AC:
87
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000115
AC:
3
AN:
26132
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39696
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000812
AC:
7
AN:
86252
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53420
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00104
AC:
6
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000387
AC:
43
AN:
1111876
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00257
AC:
155
AN:
60394
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.463
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
91
182
273
364
455
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
44
88
132
176
220
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0113
AC:
1714
AN:
152308
Hom.:
25
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0106
AC XY:
790
AN XY:
74486
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0390
AC:
1623
AN:
41566
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00399
AC:
61
AN:
15298
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000288
AC:
1
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5184
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000414
AC:
2
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10616
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000103
AC:
7
AN:
68028
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00946
AC:
20
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.498
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
85
170
255
340
425
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00477
Hom.:
12
Bravo
AF:
0.0130
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00318
AC:
11
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
May 07, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Leu29Leu in Exon 03 of GPSM2: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located within the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 4.3% (160/3738) of Af rican American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs112935966). -

Jun 07, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided Benign:2
Jan 12, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Chudley-McCullough syndrome Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.30
CADD
Benign
10
DANN
Benign
0.92
PhyloP100
8.0
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Mutation Taster
=0/100
disease causing

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs112935966; hg19: chr1-109439516; API