rs115379077
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000083.3(CLCN1):c.26G>A(p.Arg9His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00133 in 1,613,654 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 15 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R9S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000083.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLCN1 | NM_000083.3 | c.26G>A | p.Arg9His | missense_variant | 1/23 | ENST00000343257.7 | |
CLCN1 | NR_046453.2 | n.128G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 1/22 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLCN1 | ENST00000343257.7 | c.26G>A | p.Arg9His | missense_variant | 1/23 | 1 | NM_000083.3 | P4 | |
CLCN1 | ENST00000650516.2 | c.26G>A | p.Arg9His | missense_variant | 1/23 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00711 AC: 1082AN: 152168Hom.: 10 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00177 AC: 444AN: 250658Hom.: 3 AF XY: 0.00137 AC XY: 185AN XY: 135528
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000727 AC: 1062AN: 1461368Hom.: 5 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000611 AC XY: 444AN XY: 727022
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00711 AC: 1082AN: 152286Hom.: 10 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00705 AC XY: 525AN XY: 74458
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jan 02, 2018 | - - |
Congenital myotonia, autosomal recessive form;C2936781:Congenital myotonia, autosomal dominant form Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Nov 22, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 10, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Batten-Turner congenital myopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
CLCN1-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jul 03, 2019 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at