rs115541691

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1

The NM_006516.4(SLC2A1):​c.507C>T​(p.Leu169Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000239 in 1,612,358 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00097 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00016 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

SLC2A1
NM_006516.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.511
Variant links:
Genes affected
SLC2A1 (HGNC:11005): (solute carrier family 2 member 1) This gene encodes a major glucose transporter in the mammalian blood-brain barrier. The encoded protein is found primarily in the cell membrane and on the cell surface, where it can also function as a receptor for human T-cell leukemia virus (HTLV) I and II. Mutations in this gene have been found in a family with paroxysmal exertion-induced dyskinesia. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.57).
BP6
Variant 1-42930635-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-42930635-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 139158.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-42930635-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr1-42930635-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.511 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000972 (148/152324) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00313 (130/41562). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00269. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 62 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SLC2A1NM_006516.4 linkc.507C>T p.Leu169Leu synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 10 ENST00000426263.10 NP_006507.2 P11166Q59GX2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SLC2A1ENST00000426263.10 linkc.507C>T p.Leu169Leu synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 10 1 NM_006516.4 ENSP00000416293.2 P11166

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000972
AC:
148
AN:
152206
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00314
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000882
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000955
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000256
AC:
63
AN:
246184
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000150
AC XY:
20
AN XY:
133498
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00332
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000878
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000101
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000331
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000541
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000162
AC:
237
AN:
1460034
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000150
AC XY:
109
AN XY:
726092
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00389
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000135
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000630
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000448
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000972
AC:
148
AN:
152324
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000832
AC XY:
62
AN XY:
74484
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00313
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000653
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000882
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000945
Alfa
AF:
0.000613
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00116
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Nov 08, 2023
Athena Diagnostics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 08, 2013
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 04, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Nov 01, 2023
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

SLC2A1: BP4, BP7 -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dystonia 9 Benign:1
Apr 11, 2023
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Jan 16, 2017
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Encephalopathy due to GLUT1 deficiency Benign:1
Apr 11, 2023
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Childhood onset GLUT1 deficiency syndrome 2 Benign:1
Apr 11, 2023
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

GLUT1 deficiency syndrome 1, autosomal recessive Benign:1
Jan 27, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cryohydrocytosis with reduced stomatin Benign:1
Apr 11, 2023
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Epilepsy, idiopathic generalized, susceptibility to, 12 Benign:1
Apr 11, 2023
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.57
CADD
Benign
5.9
DANN
Benign
0.76

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs115541691; hg19: chr1-43396306; API